Ryan Nijboer vs Francesco Passaro — Rome CH Round of 32

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ryan Nijboer
NED
Ryan Nijboer
#488ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 April 2024
clay
Francesco Passaro
ITA
Francesco Passaro
#182ATP
1592ELO
1578Clay ELO
$88kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
Nijboer R.
6-2 3-6 6-2
Passaro F.
Nijboer R.
6362
Passaro F.
2621

Ryan Nijboer defeated Francesco Passaro 6-2 3-6 6-2 in the Rome CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Ryan Nijboer closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nijboer R.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Passaro F.

Passaro F.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nijboer R.

Serve advantage — Passaro F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nijboer R.Passaro F.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
5.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.3
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 140). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nijboer R.Passaro F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
58
Break points saved·Dominant
35
89
Break points won·Even
15
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
2
82
Tiebreaks·Dominant
15
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nijboer R.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Passaro F.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
5.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
4.4
7.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nijboer R.Passaro F.
Freshness·Slight edge
67
60

Nijboer R.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 58 games (7d) · Passaro F.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 91 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Moro Canas A.
Gaubas V.
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Moro Canas A.
Travaglia S.
6-36-746-2
Gaubas V.
Dellien H.[8]
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Moro Canas A.
De Jong J.[5]
7-616-4
Travaglia S.
Maestrelli F.
7-697-5
Dellien H.[8]
Harris B.
2-66-36-4
Gaubas V.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-36-4
R16
Dellien H.[8]
Gakhov I.
6-36-4
Moro Canas A.
Nijboer R.
6-716-46-3
De Jong J.[5]
Serafini M.
6-36-3
Travaglia S.
Cerundolo J.[3]
4-67-56-2
Maestrelli F.
Taberner C.
6-47-5
Harris B.
Kovalik J.[4]
6-36-4
Gaubas V.
Martineau M.
7-54-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
Agamenone F.
4-66-36-1
R32
De Jong J.[5]
Fatic N.
3-67-664-1
Moro Canas A.
Piros Z.[1]
6-46-3
Harris B.
Andreev A.
3-66-36-4
Serafini M.
Brancaccio R.
3-67-626-4
Taberner C.
Buse I.
6-17-66
Kovalik J.[4]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
4-67-646-2
Nijboer R.
Passaro F.
6-23-66-2
Cerundolo J.[3]
Roca Batalla O.
6-36-2
Travaglia S.
Oradini G.
6-26-4
Maestrelli F.
Grenier H.[6]
6-06-4
Dellien H.[8]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
4-66-16-4
Gakhov I.
Cecchinato M.
6-34-66-2
Gaubas V.
Pellegrino A.[7]
6-46-1
Martineau M.
Blancaneaux G.
3-66-36-2
Agamenone F.
Pennaforti G.
6-746-36-3
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
Lavagno E.
7-616-3