James Mccabe vs Tung Lin Wu — Shenzhen CH Round of 32

Shenzhen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
James Mccabe
#242ATP
1532ELO
1481Hard ELO
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 April 2024
hard
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWL
Mccabe J.
6-1 6-7 6-2
Wu T.
Mccabe J.
66162
Wu T.
17721

James Mccabe defeated Tung Lin Wu 6-1 6-7 6-2 in the Shenzhen CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — James Mccabe came in ranked #242, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: James Mccabe came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 6–7 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mccabe J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Mccabe J.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mccabe J.Wu T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.9
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (146 vs 131). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mccabe J.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
37
10
Break points saved·Even
85
84
Break points won·Even
9
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
71
6
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
12
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mccabe J.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Wu T.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.7+106 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Hard Elo 1376
5.9Overall Elo 1532
ELO gap
4.1Overall Elo 1406
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
5.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.2
Minutes 14d
2.0
4.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mccabe J.Wu T.
Freshness·Slight edge
94
88

Mccabe J.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d) · Wu T.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.[4]
Duckworth J.[1]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Bertola R.
6-36-2
Harris L.[4]
Lajal M.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Harris L.[4]
Kachmazov A.
6-34-66-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Bellucci M.[5]
4-66-37-64
Bertola R.
Schoolkate T.
6-46-2
Lajal M.
Yevseyev D.[6]
7-57-64
R16
Duckworth J.[1]
Escoffier A.
6-46-3
Lajal M.
Fery A.
6-26-2
Bellucci M.[5]
Marie J.
7-56-2
Schoolkate T.
Bolt A.
6-26-2
Bertola R.
Wong C.[8]
6-46-4
Kachmazov A.
Mccabe J.
6-36-4
Harris L.[4]
Hsu Y.
6-46-4
Yevseyev D.[6]
Sekulic P.
7-636-3
R32
Schoolkate T.
Uchiyama Y.[3]
6-03-1
Wong C.[8]
Trotter J.
7-56-2
Sekulic P.
Cina F.
6-44-66-4
Yevseyev D.[6]
Celikbilek A.
3-66-16-4
Bertola R.
Shimizu Y.
7-666-3
Hsu Y.
Zhou Y.
7-56-746-3
Fery A.
Berankis R.
2-66-16-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Te R.
7-56-2
Escoffier A.
Saville L.
6-46-2
Marie J.
Sun F.
6-13-66-4
Bellucci M.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-36-4
Bolt A.
Noguchi R.
2-66-37-65
Kachmazov A.
Moriya H.
6-26-3
Mccabe J.
Wu T.
6-16-716-2
Harris L.[4]
Sweeny D.
6-26-2
Lajal M.
Tu L.[9]
6-34-66-4