Mitchell Krueger vs Clement Tabur — Savannah CH Round of 32

Savannah CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1427Clay ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 April 2024
clay
Clement Tabur
FRA8
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
Krueger M.
6-3 6-2
Tabur C.
Krueger M.
662
Tabur C.
320

Mitchell Krueger defeated Clement Tabur 6-3 6-2 in the Savannah CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Krueger M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Tabur C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krueger M.Tabur C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (149 vs 130). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Krueger M.Tabur C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
16
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
87
74
Break points won·Slight edge
14
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
0
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Krueger M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Tabur C.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.9Clay Elo 1427
Surface ELO
6.1+126 Clay Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1461
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1607
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.3
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
6.4
0.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Krueger M.Tabur C.
Freshness·Dominant
87
55

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d) · Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Ritschard A.[5]
Andrade A.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Ritschard A.[5]
Popko D.
6-47-64
Andrade A.
Janvier M.
7-56-0
Quarter-finals
Janvier M.
Boyer T.[6]
2-66-26-3
Ritschard A.[5]
Hemery C.
7-57-5
Popko D.
Brouwer G.
7-676-4
Andrade A.
Gomez F.
7-56-1
R16
Gomez F.
Mayo A.
6-37-65
Ritschard A.[5]
Jasika O.
6-16-1
Hemery C.
Schwaerzler J.
6-46-2
Brouwer G.
Kudla D.[4]
6-36-4
Popko D.
Quinn E.
6-45-76-3
Boyer T.[6]
Sandgren T.
1-66-06-1
Janvier M.
Boitan G.
3-66-16-3
Andrade A.
Krueger M.
6-37-63
R32
Kudla D.[4]
Mccormick T.
6-47-64
Mayo A.
Mmoh M.[2]
4-66-42-0
Jasika O.
Tomic B.
1-1
Andrade A.
Durasovic V.
7-636-2
Popko D.
Kuzuhara B.
6-36-4
Boitan G.
Kirchheimer S.
2-66-26-1
Hemery C.
Searle H.
7-56-4
Krueger M.
Tabur C.[8]
6-36-2
Kudla D.
Mccormick T.
6-47-64
Schwaerzler J.
Wolf J.[1]
6-26-1
Ritschard A.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-37-5
Brouwer G.
Habib H.
6-26-4
Quinn E.
Crawford O.[7]
6-26-4
Boyer T.[6]
Oliveira G.
7-56-1
Sandgren T.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-37-64
Janvier M.
Kypson P.[3]
3-67-656-4
Gomez F.
Gea A.
6-36-756-3