Lloyd Harris vs Alibek Kachmazov — Shenzhen CH Quarter-final

Shenzhen CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Lloyd Harris
RSA4
Lloyd Harris
#187ATP
1665ELO
1640Hard ELO
$130kYTD
$4.7MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 April 2024
hard
RUS
Alibek Kachmazov
#782ATP
1490ELO
1467Hard ELO
23 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
Harris L.
6-3 4-6 6-3
Kachmazov A.
Harris L.
6462
Kachmazov A.
3631

Lloyd Harris defeated Alibek Kachmazov 6-3 4-6 6-3 in the Shenzhen CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Lloyd Harris closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Harris L.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Kachmazov A.

Kachmazov A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Harris L.

Serve advantage — Harris L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Harris L.Kachmazov A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.2
6.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (103 vs 99). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Harris L.Kachmazov A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
57
49
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
82
Break points won·Slight edge
24
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
61
Tiebreaks·Dominant
24
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Harris L.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Kachmazov A.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+174 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Hard Elo 1467
7.4Overall Elo 1665
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1490
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.0
Surface form
5.8
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
1.4
Minutes 14d
4.0
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.[4]
Duckworth J.[1]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Bertola R.
6-36-2
Harris L.[4]
Lajal M.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Harris L.[4]
Kachmazov A.
6-34-66-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Bellucci M.[5]
4-66-37-64
Bertola R.
Schoolkate T.
6-46-2
Lajal M.
Yevseyev D.[6]
7-57-64
R16
Duckworth J.[1]
Escoffier A.
6-46-3
Lajal M.
Fery A.
6-26-2
Bellucci M.[5]
Marie J.
7-56-2
Schoolkate T.
Bolt A.
6-26-2
Bertola R.
Wong C.[8]
6-46-4
Kachmazov A.
Mccabe J.
6-36-4
Harris L.[4]
Hsu Y.
6-46-4
Yevseyev D.[6]
Sekulic P.
7-636-3
R32
Schoolkate T.
Uchiyama Y.[3]
6-03-1
Wong C.[8]
Trotter J.
7-56-2
Sekulic P.
Cina F.
6-44-66-4
Yevseyev D.[6]
Celikbilek A.
3-66-16-4
Bertola R.
Shimizu Y.
7-666-3
Hsu Y.
Zhou Y.
7-56-746-3
Fery A.
Berankis R.
2-66-16-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Te R.
7-56-2
Escoffier A.
Saville L.
6-46-2
Marie J.
Sun F.
6-13-66-4
Bellucci M.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-36-4
Bolt A.
Noguchi R.
2-66-37-65
Kachmazov A.
Moriya H.
6-26-3
Mccabe J.
Wu T.
6-16-716-2
Harris L.[4]
Sweeny D.
6-26-2
Lajal M.
Tu L.[9]
6-34-66-4