Lloyd Harris vs Yu Hsiou Hsu — Shenzhen CH Round of 16

Shenzhen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Lloyd Harris
RSA4
Lloyd Harris
#187ATP
1665ELO
1640Hard ELO
$130kYTD
$4.7MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 April 2024
hard
Yu Hsiou Hsu
TPE
Yu Hsiou Hsu
#210ATP
1489ELO
1468Hard ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Harris L.
6-4 6-4
Hsu Y.
Harris L.
662
Hsu Y.
440

Lloyd Harris defeated Yu Hsiou Hsu 6-4 6-4 in the Shenzhen CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Lloyd Harris edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Harris L.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Hsu Y.

Hsu Y.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Harris L.

Serve advantage — Harris L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Harris L.Hsu Y.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
3.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (103 vs 128). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Harris L.Hsu Y.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
57
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
74
Break points won·Clear edge
24
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
50
Tiebreaks·Dominant
24
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Harris L.
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Hsu Y.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.0+172 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Hard Elo 1468
7.0Overall Elo 1665
ELO gap
3.0Overall Elo 1489
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
8.0
Surface form
4.6
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
1.4
Minutes 14d
5.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.[4]
Duckworth J.[1]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Bertola R.
6-36-2
Harris L.[4]
Lajal M.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Harris L.[4]
Kachmazov A.
6-34-66-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Bellucci M.[5]
4-66-37-64
Bertola R.
Schoolkate T.
6-46-2
Lajal M.
Yevseyev D.[6]
7-57-64
R16
Duckworth J.[1]
Escoffier A.
6-46-3
Lajal M.
Fery A.
6-26-2
Bellucci M.[5]
Marie J.
7-56-2
Schoolkate T.
Bolt A.
6-26-2
Bertola R.
Wong C.[8]
6-46-4
Kachmazov A.
Mccabe J.
6-36-4
Harris L.[4]
Hsu Y.
6-46-4
Yevseyev D.[6]
Sekulic P.
7-636-3
R32
Schoolkate T.
Uchiyama Y.[3]
6-03-1
Wong C.[8]
Trotter J.
7-56-2
Sekulic P.
Cina F.
6-44-66-4
Yevseyev D.[6]
Celikbilek A.
3-66-16-4
Bertola R.
Shimizu Y.
7-666-3
Hsu Y.
Zhou Y.
7-56-746-3
Fery A.
Berankis R.
2-66-16-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Te R.
7-56-2
Escoffier A.
Saville L.
6-46-2
Marie J.
Sun F.
6-13-66-4
Bellucci M.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-36-4
Bolt A.
Noguchi R.
2-66-37-65
Kachmazov A.
Moriya H.
6-26-3
Mccabe J.
Wu T.
6-16-716-2
Harris L.[4]
Sweeny D.
6-26-2
Lajal M.
Tu L.[9]
6-34-66-4