Hernan Casanova vs Matias Soto — Concepcion CH Round of 32

Concepcion CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Hernan Casanova
ARG7
Hernan Casanova
#337ATP
1393ELO
1381Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 April 2024
clay
CHI
Matias Soto
#249ATP
1421ELO
1412Clay ELO
27 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWL
Casanova H.
6-3 6-0
Soto M.
Casanova H.
662
Soto M.
300

Hernan Casanova defeated Matias Soto 6-3 6-0 in the Concepcion CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Matias Soto came in ranked #249, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Casanova H.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Soto M.

Soto M.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Casanova H.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Casanova H.Soto M.
1st serve in·Clear edge
75%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
61%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
58%
62%
Return points won·Even
43%
39%
Break points saved·Even
56%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
0.5
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.3
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (74 vs 109). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Casanova H.Soto M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
8
34
Break points saved·Dominant
24
51
Break points won·Slight edge
22
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
68
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
34
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Casanova H.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Soto M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.0Clay Elo 1381
Surface ELO
6.0+31 Clay Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1393
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1421
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
6.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.8
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Casanova H.Soto M.
Freshness·Clear edge
70
56

Casanova H.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 62 games (7d) · Soto M.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 120 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bueno G.[6]
Ficovich J.[2]
6-46-0
Semi-finals
Ficovich J.[2]
Sakellaridis S.
6-27-5
Bueno G.[6]
Pereira J.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Bueno G.[6]
Olivieri G.[1]
4-66-27-64
Ficovich J.[2]
Prado Angelo J.
6-13-67-65
Pereira J.
Guillen Meza A.[4]
6-44-67-5
Sakellaridis S.
Mena F.
6-40-66-3
R16
Bueno G.[6]
Ribero F.
6-36-1
Pereira J.
Casanova H.[7]
6-746-36-1
Olivieri G.[1]
Aboian V.
6-46-4
Guillen Meza A.[4]
Aboian L.
6-06-3
Sakellaridis S.
Kirkin E.[5]
6-33-67-5
Mena F.
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-56-4
Prado Angelo J.
Roncadelli F.
6-14-66-3
Ficovich J.[2]
Torres J.
6-16-4
R32
Dutra Da Silva D.
Olivo R.[3]
7-55-1
Torres J.
Rodriguez L.
6-05-2
Sakellaridis S.
Villanueva G.
6-36-4
Casanova H.[7]
Soto M.
6-36-0
Prado Angelo J.
Alvarez N.
6-16-2
Pereira J.
Becerra Otarola I.
6-26-0
Ficovich J.[2]
Justo G.
6-06-756-3
Olivieri G.[1]
Falabella L.
6-36-3
Aboian V.
Uchida K.
6-26-1
Ribero F.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-36-4
Bueno G.[6]
Zanellato N.
5-76-36-0
Guillen Meza A.[4]
Torres Fernandez B.
6-26-1
Aboian L.
Gomez E.
6-37-60
Kirkin E.[5]
Ambrogi L.
6-46-2
Mena F.
Nunez D.
7-56-1
Roncadelli F.
Cid R.[8]
6-17-5