Carlos Taberner vs Ignacio Buse — Rome CH Round of 32

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Carlos Taberner
ESP
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 April 2024
clay
Ignacio Buse
PER
Ignacio Buse
#33ATP
1822ELO
1786Clay ELO
$949kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWWW
Taberner C.
6-1 7-6
Buse I.
Taberner C.
6782
Buse I.
1660

Carlos Taberner defeated Ignacio Buse 6-1 7-6 in the Rome CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Ignacio Buse came in ranked #33.

Key context

  • Match story: Carlos Taberner came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Taberner C.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Buse I.

Buse I.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Taberner C.Buse I.
—
Serve
41
—
Return
8

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Taberner C.Buse I.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
43%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.5
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (156 vs 144). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Taberner C.Buse I.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
53
63
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
87
Break points won·Dominant
59
28
Deciding sets·Slight edge
75
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Taberner C.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Buse I.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.9Clay Elo 1605
Surface ELO
6.1+182 Clay Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1610
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1822
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.2
Surface form
5.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.6
Minutes 14d
7.6
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Taberner C.Buse I.
Freshness·
—
98

Buse I.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Moro Canas A.
Gaubas V.
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Moro Canas A.
Travaglia S.
6-36-746-2
Gaubas V.
Dellien H.[8]
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Moro Canas A.
De Jong J.[5]
7-616-4
Travaglia S.
Maestrelli F.
7-697-5
Dellien H.[8]
Harris B.
2-66-36-4
Gaubas V.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-36-4
R16
Dellien H.[8]
Gakhov I.
6-36-4
Moro Canas A.
Nijboer R.
6-716-46-3
De Jong J.[5]
Serafini M.
6-36-3
Travaglia S.
Cerundolo J.[3]
4-67-56-2
Maestrelli F.
Taberner C.
6-47-5
Harris B.
Kovalik J.[4]
6-36-4
Gaubas V.
Martineau M.
7-54-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
Agamenone F.
4-66-36-1
R32
De Jong J.[5]
Fatic N.
3-67-664-1
Moro Canas A.
Piros Z.[1]
6-46-3
Harris B.
Andreev A.
3-66-36-4
Serafini M.
Brancaccio R.
3-67-626-4
Taberner C.
Buse I.
6-17-66
Kovalik J.[4]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
4-67-646-2
Nijboer R.
Passaro F.
6-23-66-2
Cerundolo J.[3]
Roca Batalla O.
6-36-2
Travaglia S.
Oradini G.
6-26-4
Maestrelli F.
Grenier H.[6]
6-06-4
Dellien H.[8]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
4-66-16-4
Gakhov I.
Cecchinato M.
6-34-66-2
Gaubas V.
Pellegrino A.[7]
6-46-1
Martineau M.
Blancaneaux G.
3-66-36-2
Agamenone F.
Pennaforti G.
6-746-36-3
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
Lavagno E.
7-616-3