Juan Pablo Ficovich vs Juan Carlos Prado Angelo — Concepcion CH Quarter-final

Concepcion CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Juan Pablo Ficovich
ARG2
Juan Pablo Ficovich
#224ATP
1415ELO
1383Clay ELO
$100kYTD
$984kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 April 2024
clay
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
BOL
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
#173ATP
1576ELO
1554Clay ELO
$163kYTD
$320kCAREER
21 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLWWWL
Ficovich J.
6-1 3-6 7-6
Prado Angelo J.
Ficovich J.
63772
Prado Angelo J.
16651

Juan Pablo Ficovich defeated Juan Carlos Prado Angelo 6-1 3-6 7-6 in the Concepcion CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Juan Pablo Ficovich came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ficovich J.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Prado Angelo J.

Prado Angelo J.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Ficovich J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ficovich J.Prado Angelo J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
58%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (155 vs 138). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ficovich J.Prado Angelo J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
16
46
Break points saved·Dominant
76
40
Break points won·Clear edge
9
30
Deciding sets·Dominant
27
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
5
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ficovich J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Prado Angelo J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.4Clay Elo 1383
Surface ELO
6.6+171 Clay Elo edge
3.9Overall Elo 1415
ELO gap
6.1Overall Elo 1576
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
5.5
Fatigue & Travel
6.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ficovich J.Prado Angelo J.
Freshness·Slight edge
86
75

Ficovich J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d) · Prado Angelo J.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 59 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bueno G.[6]
Ficovich J.[2]
6-46-0
Semi-finals
Ficovich J.[2]
Sakellaridis S.
6-27-5
Bueno G.[6]
Pereira J.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Bueno G.[6]
Olivieri G.[1]
4-66-27-64
Ficovich J.[2]
Prado Angelo J.
6-13-67-65
Pereira J.
Guillen Meza A.[4]
6-44-67-5
Sakellaridis S.
Mena F.
6-40-66-3
R16
Bueno G.[6]
Ribero F.
6-36-1
Pereira J.
Casanova H.[7]
6-746-36-1
Olivieri G.[1]
Aboian V.
6-46-4
Guillen Meza A.[4]
Aboian L.
6-06-3
Sakellaridis S.
Kirkin E.[5]
6-33-67-5
Mena F.
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-56-4
Prado Angelo J.
Roncadelli F.
6-14-66-3
Ficovich J.[2]
Torres J.
6-16-4
R32
Dutra Da Silva D.
Olivo R.[3]
7-55-1
Torres J.
Rodriguez L.
6-05-2
Sakellaridis S.
Villanueva G.
6-36-4
Casanova H.[7]
Soto M.
6-36-0
Prado Angelo J.
Alvarez N.
6-16-2
Pereira J.
Becerra Otarola I.
6-26-0
Ficovich J.[2]
Justo G.
6-06-756-3
Olivieri G.[1]
Falabella L.
6-36-3
Aboian V.
Uchida K.
6-26-1
Ribero F.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-36-4
Bueno G.[6]
Zanellato N.
5-76-36-0
Guillen Meza A.[4]
Torres Fernandez B.
6-26-1
Aboian L.
Gomez E.
6-37-60
Kirkin E.[5]
Ambrogi L.
6-46-2
Mena F.
Nunez D.
7-56-1
Roncadelli F.
Cid R.[8]
6-17-5