Tung Lin Wu vs Coleman Wong — Gwangju CH Round of 16

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
hard
HKG8
Coleman Wong
#111ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLWLL
Wu T.
6-3 1-6 7-5
Wong C.
Wu T.
6172
Wong C.
3651

Tung Lin Wu defeated Coleman Wong 6-3 1-6 7-5 in the Gwangju CH round of 16 on hard. Tung Lin Wu extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Tung Lin Wu closed it out in three sets, 6–3 1–6 7–5.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-09-17Davis Cup WG2 R1: TPE vs HKGRRhardTung Lin Wu6-1 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Wong C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wu T.Wong C.
—
Serve
37
—
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Wong C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.8
8.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (131 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu T.Wong C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
43
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
91
Break points won·Even
6
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
6
43
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu T.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Wong C.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.9Hard Elo 1376
Surface ELO
8.1+217 Hard Elo edge
1.8Overall Elo 1406
ELO gap
8.2Overall Elo 1602
10.0
H2H
0.0
2.5
Surface form
6.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
7.2
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Wong C.
Freshness·Slight edge
80
89

Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Wong C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.[6]
Yunchaokete B.[5]
6-23-66-4
Semi-finals
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Berankis R.
4-66-47-65
Harris L.[6]
Wu T.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Harris L.[6]
Shimabukuro S.[3]
6-16-3
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Hsu Y.
7-56-3
Berankis R.
Lajal M.
6-26-746-3
Wu T.
Kachmazov A.
6-35-77-63
R16
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Fery A.
6-36-784-4
Berankis R.
Mccabe J.
7-667-66
Hsu Y.
Bolt A.
6-46-4
Harris L.[6]
Chung Y.
6-46-4
Lajal M.
Sekulic P.
7-646-4
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Hong S.
6-46-4
Wu T.
Wong C.[8]
6-31-67-5
Kachmazov A.
Nam J.
6-46-3
R32
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Blockx A.
3-2
Sekulic P.
Bellucci M.[4]
0-66-17-5
Wu T.
Sweeny D.
4-66-36-3
Wong C.[8]
Echargui M.
6-767-56-3
Fery A.
Sun F.
6-43-66-3
Kachmazov A.
Escoffier A.
7-56-4
Berankis R.
Gerasimov E.
7-666-1
Hsu Y.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-36-766-1
Bolt A.
Marie J.
6-33-67-64
Lajal M.
Lee D.
6-16-1
Mccabe J.
Tu L.[7]
4-66-46-1
Harris L.[6]
Saville L.
6-26-2
Chung Y.
Jubb P.
6-44-66-3
Hong S.
Marchenko I.
6-36-2
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Lee J.
6-36-2
Nam J.
Virtanen O.[2]
6-46-3