Tung Lin Wu vs Dane Sweeny — Gwangju CH Round of 32

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
hard
AUS
Dane Sweeny
#122ATP
1460ELO
1444Hard ELO
$256kYTD
$861kCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Wu T.
4-6 6-3 6-3
Sweeny D.
Wu T.
4662
Sweeny D.
6331

Tung Lin Wu defeated Dane Sweeny 4-6 6-3 6-3 in the Gwangju CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Dane Sweeny came in ranked #122.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sweeny D.

Sweeny D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Sweeny D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
2.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (131 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu T.Sweeny D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
45
Break points saved·Clear edge
84
69
Break points won·Slight edge
6
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
6
68
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Sweeny D.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.8Hard Elo 1376
Surface ELO
6.2+68 Hard Elo edge
3.8Overall Elo 1406
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1460
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
2.5
Surface form
5.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Sweeny D.
Freshness·Clear edge
80
98

Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Sweeny D.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.[6]
Yunchaokete B.[5]
6-23-66-4
Semi-finals
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Berankis R.
4-66-47-65
Harris L.[6]
Wu T.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Harris L.[6]
Shimabukuro S.[3]
6-16-3
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Hsu Y.
7-56-3
Berankis R.
Lajal M.
6-26-746-3
Wu T.
Kachmazov A.
6-35-77-63
R16
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Fery A.
6-36-784-4
Berankis R.
Mccabe J.
7-667-66
Hsu Y.
Bolt A.
6-46-4
Harris L.[6]
Chung Y.
6-46-4
Lajal M.
Sekulic P.
7-646-4
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Hong S.
6-46-4
Wu T.
Wong C.[8]
6-31-67-5
Kachmazov A.
Nam J.
6-46-3
R32
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Blockx A.
3-2
Sekulic P.
Bellucci M.[4]
0-66-17-5
Wu T.
Sweeny D.
4-66-36-3
Wong C.[8]
Echargui M.
6-767-56-3
Fery A.
Sun F.
6-43-66-3
Kachmazov A.
Escoffier A.
7-56-4
Berankis R.
Gerasimov E.
7-666-1
Hsu Y.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-36-766-1
Bolt A.
Marie J.
6-33-67-64
Lajal M.
Lee D.
6-16-1
Mccabe J.
Tu L.[7]
4-66-46-1
Harris L.[6]
Saville L.
6-26-2
Chung Y.
Jubb P.
6-44-66-3
Hong S.
Marchenko I.
6-36-2
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Lee J.
6-36-2
Nam J.
Virtanen O.[2]
6-46-3