Jesper De Jong vs Gauthier Onclin — Oeiras CH Round of 32

Oeiras CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jesper De Jong
NED9
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1696Clay ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
clay
Gauthier Onclin
BEL
Gauthier Onclin
#169ATP
1567ELO
1496Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$616kCAREER
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWWL
De Jong J.
6-3 6-2
Onclin G.
De Jong J.
662
Onclin G.
320

Jesper De Jong defeated Gauthier Onclin 6-3 6-2 in the Oeiras CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
De Jong J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Onclin G.

Onclin G.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

Serve advantage — De Jong J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
De Jong J.Onclin G.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.2
1.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (157 vs 99). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Jong J.Onclin G.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
57
46
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
79
Break points won·Clear edge
37
17
Deciding sets·Slight edge
69
74
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
62
50

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Jong J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Onclin G.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
6.3+199 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.7Clay Elo 1496
5.7Overall Elo 1711
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1567
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
6.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Jong J.Onclin G.
Freshness·Even
78
80

De Jong J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 25 games (7d) · Onclin G.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 59 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Comesana F.[4]
Blanchet U.
6-43-67-5
Faria J.
Ymer E.
3-67-636-4
Semi-finals
Blanchet U.
Royer V.
6-46-2
Comesana F.[4]
Faria J.
5-77-646-0
Faria J.
Burruchaga R.[6]
6-46-756-1
Ymer E.
Yevseyev D.
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Comesana F.[4]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-36-4
Faria J.
Gaubas V.
6-47-65
Blanchet U.
Napolitano S.
4-66-16-4
Royer V.
Novak D.
7-671-66-3
Burruchaga R.[6]
De Loore J.
6-32-0
Yevseyev D.
Zhukayev B.
6-42-66-3
Faria J.
Novak D.
2-66-46-0
Ymer E.
Choinski J.
6-21-66-4
R16
Faria J.
Tseng C.
6-26-3
Royer V.
De Jong J.[9]
6-26-3
Gaubas V.
Atmane T.[6]
6-16-0
Napolitano S.
Fognini F.[1]
7-54-67-65
Blanchet U.
Nava E.[5]
6-47-63
Novak D.
Agamenone F.
6-36-1
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Elias G.
6-26-3
Comesana F.[4]
Ymer E.
1-66-47-66
Novak D.
Michelsen A.[1]
7-636-4
Zhukayev B.
Kypson P.[7]
7-57-65
Ymer E.
Harris L.[5]
7-56-3
Faria J.
Heide G.
6-46-4
De Loore J.
Kopriva V.[4]
6-41-66-3
Burruchaga R.[6]
Svrcina D.
6-36-4
Yevseyev D.
Nava E.[3]
7-686-0
Choinski J.
Boyer T.
6-47-5
R32
Elias G.
Kasnikowski M.
6-11-1
Ymer E.
Sachko V.
6-40-0
Novak D.
Cerundolo J.[8]
6-36-2
Blanchet U.
Rocha H.
6-37-61
Napolitano S.
Kovalik J.
7-616-2
Fognini F.[1]
De Loore J.
4-66-46-4
Nava E.[5]
Erhard M.
4-66-36-2
De Jong J.[9]
Onclin G.
6-36-2
Royer V.
Andreev A.
6-05-76-4
Agamenone F.
Blancaneaux G.
6-33-66-3
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Moreno De Alboran N.[7]
7-57-5
Comesana F.[4]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-25-76-3
Atmane T.[6]
Harris B.
2-66-36-4
Gaubas V.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-52-66-3
Tseng C.
Halys Q.
4-67-636-2
Faria J.
Monteiro T.[2]
6-23-67-62
Novak D.
Added D.
6-01-0
Zhukayev B.
Onclin G.
7-637-67
Svrcina D.
Cerundolo J.
4-67-622-0
Choinski J.
Svajda Z.[2]
6-36-0
Ymer E.
Quinn E.
6-36-4
Michelsen A.[1]
Rocha H.
4-66-36-4
Heide G.
Popko D.
6-16-2
Faria J.
Mochizuki S.[8]
6-26-4
Kopriva V.[4]
Ficovich J.
6-27-5
De Loore J.
Elias G.
6-44-66-3
Burruchaga R.[6]
Andreev A.
7-666-3
Kypson P.[7]
Wong C.
6-36-1
Yevseyev D.
Neumayer L.
3-67-56-0
Nava E.[3]
Berrettini J.
6-726-47-5
Harris L.[5]
Ferreira Silva F.
7-57-66
Boyer T.
Blanch D.
6-787-606-3