Seong Chan Hong vs Illya Marchenko — Gwangju CH Round of 32

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
KOR
Seong Chan Hong
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
hard
UKR
Illya Marchenko
#1740ATP
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Hong S.
6-3 6-2
Marchenko I.
Hong S.
662
Marchenko I.
320

Seong Chan Hong defeated Illya Marchenko 6-3 6-2 in the Gwangju CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Seong Chan Hong came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Seong Chan Hong extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-10-02Shanghai MastersQ1hardSeong Chan Hong7-6(5) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Hong S.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Marchenko I.

Marchenko I.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Hong S.

Serve advantage — Hong S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hong S.Marchenko I.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.9
5.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (68 vs 33). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hong S.Marchenko I.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
13
Break points saved·Even
77
80
Break points won·Clear edge
30
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
65
14
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hong S.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Marchenko I.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
4.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
6.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.[6]
Yunchaokete B.[5]
6-23-66-4
Semi-finals
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Berankis R.
4-66-47-65
Harris L.[6]
Wu T.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Harris L.[6]
Shimabukuro S.[3]
6-16-3
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Hsu Y.
7-56-3
Berankis R.
Lajal M.
6-26-746-3
Wu T.
Kachmazov A.
6-35-77-63
R16
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Fery A.
6-36-784-4
Berankis R.
Mccabe J.
7-667-66
Hsu Y.
Bolt A.
6-46-4
Harris L.[6]
Chung Y.
6-46-4
Lajal M.
Sekulic P.
7-646-4
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Hong S.
6-46-4
Wu T.
Wong C.[8]
6-31-67-5
Kachmazov A.
Nam J.
6-46-3
R32
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Blockx A.
3-2
Sekulic P.
Bellucci M.[4]
0-66-17-5
Wu T.
Sweeny D.
4-66-36-3
Wong C.[8]
Echargui M.
6-767-56-3
Fery A.
Sun F.
6-43-66-3
Kachmazov A.
Escoffier A.
7-56-4
Berankis R.
Gerasimov E.
7-666-1
Hsu Y.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-36-766-1
Bolt A.
Marie J.
6-33-67-64
Lajal M.
Lee D.
6-16-1
Mccabe J.
Tu L.[7]
4-66-46-1
Harris L.[6]
Saville L.
6-26-2
Chung Y.
Jubb P.
6-44-66-3
Hong S.
Marchenko I.
6-36-2
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Lee J.
6-36-2
Nam J.
Virtanen O.[2]
6-46-3