Calvin Hemery vs Patrick Kypson — Tallahassee CH Round of 32

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Calvin Hemery
#298ATP
1439ELO
1449Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
clay
Patrick Kypson
USA3
Patrick Kypson
#112ATP
1641ELO
1555Clay ELO
$260kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWL
Hemery C.
7-6 6-3
Kypson P.
Hemery C.
7762
Kypson P.
6230

Calvin Hemery defeated Patrick Kypson 7-6 6-3 in the Tallahassee CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Patrick Kypson came in ranked #112, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Calvin Hemery closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hemery C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kypson P.

Kypson P.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Hemery C.

Serve advantage — Kypson P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hemery C.Kypson P.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
67%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
63%
66%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.7
7.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (167 vs 139). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hemery C.Kypson P.
Clutch Rating·Even
45
42
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
93
Break points won·Dominant
3
41
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
17
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
71
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hemery C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Kypson P.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.2Clay Elo 1449
Surface ELO
5.8+106 Clay Elo edge
3.1Overall Elo 1439
ELO gap
6.9Overall Elo 1641
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
6.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.5
Minutes 14d
6.5
0.0
3-set count
7.0
4.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hemery C.Kypson P.
Freshness·Dominant
69
94

Hemery C.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 49 games (7d) · Kypson P.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bergs Z.[2]
Krueger M.
6-47-69
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.[2]
Hemery C.
3-66-44-1
Krueger M.
Kozlov S.
6-33-66-1
Quarter-finals
Hemery C.
Ritschard A.[7]
7-56-736-4
Krueger M.
Schwaerzler J.
7-57-64
Kozlov S.
Crawford O.
6-26-2
Bergs Z.[2]
Melzer G.
6-16-4
R16
Bergs Z.[2]
Tabur C.
7-645-76-3
Schwaerzler J.
Searle H.
6-17-65
Krueger M.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-636-2
Crawford O.
Habib H.
6-36-4
Kozlov S.
Sandgren T.
6-26-756-1
Ritschard A.[7]
Bobrov B.
6-33-66-1
Hemery C.
Denolly C.
6-36-2
Melzer G.
Gomez F.
4-67-687-66
R32
Hemery C.
Kypson P.[3]
7-626-3
Ritschard A.[7]
Kuzuhara B.
6-47-5
Bobrov B.
Bigun K.
4-66-26-4
Kozlov S.
Campana Lee G.
4-66-36-0
Searle H.
Wolf J.[1]
7-57-66
Schwaerzler J.
Fonio G.
6-26-4
Krueger M.
Quinn E.
6-17-62
Kwiatkowski T.
Boyer T.[8]
2-66-26-4
Habib H.
Kudla D.[4]
7-666-4
Crawford O.
Popko D.
6-07-62
Sandgren T.
Damm M.[6]
7-56-3
Denolly C.
Vale D.
6-47-60
Gomez F.
Andrade A.
6-46-4
Melzer G.
Edmund K.
6-46-1
Tabur C.
Lilov V.
6-16-1
Bergs Z.[2]
Kodat T.
6-46-2