Lloyd Harris vs Tung Lin Wu — Gwangju CH Semi-final

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Lloyd Harris
RSA6
Lloyd Harris
#187ATP
1665ELO
1640Hard ELO
$130kYTD
$4.7MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
hard
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Harris L.
6-4 6-4
Wu T.
Harris L.
662
Wu T.
440

Lloyd Harris defeated Tung Lin Wu 6-4 6-4 in the Gwangju CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Lloyd Harris came in ranked #187, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Lloyd Harris edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Harris L.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Harris L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Harris L.Wu T.
1st serve in·Even
64%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
63%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.2
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (103 vs 131). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Harris L.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
84
Break points won·Clear edge
24
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
6
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
24
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Harris L.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Wu T.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.0+264 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.0Hard Elo 1376
8.1Overall Elo 1665
ELO gap
1.9Overall Elo 1406
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.2
Surface form
2.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
8.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Harris L.Wu T.
Freshness·
—
80

Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.[6]
Yunchaokete B.[5]
6-23-66-4
Semi-finals
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Berankis R.
4-66-47-65
Harris L.[6]
Wu T.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Harris L.[6]
Shimabukuro S.[3]
6-16-3
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Hsu Y.
7-56-3
Berankis R.
Lajal M.
6-26-746-3
Wu T.
Kachmazov A.
6-35-77-63
R16
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Fery A.
6-36-784-4
Berankis R.
Mccabe J.
7-667-66
Hsu Y.
Bolt A.
6-46-4
Harris L.[6]
Chung Y.
6-46-4
Lajal M.
Sekulic P.
7-646-4
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Hong S.
6-46-4
Wu T.
Wong C.[8]
6-31-67-5
Kachmazov A.
Nam J.
6-46-3
R32
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Blockx A.
3-2
Sekulic P.
Bellucci M.[4]
0-66-17-5
Wu T.
Sweeny D.
4-66-36-3
Wong C.[8]
Echargui M.
6-767-56-3
Fery A.
Sun F.
6-43-66-3
Kachmazov A.
Escoffier A.
7-56-4
Berankis R.
Gerasimov E.
7-666-1
Hsu Y.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-36-766-1
Bolt A.
Marie J.
6-33-67-64
Lajal M.
Lee D.
6-16-1
Mccabe J.
Tu L.[7]
4-66-46-1
Harris L.[6]
Saville L.
6-26-2
Chung Y.
Jubb P.
6-44-66-3
Hong S.
Marchenko I.
6-36-2
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Lee J.
6-36-2
Nam J.
Virtanen O.[2]
6-46-3