Juan Pablo Ficovich vs Bernard Tomic — Acapulco CH Round of 32

Acapulco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Juan Pablo Ficovich
ARG
Juan Pablo Ficovich
#224ATP
1415ELO
1419Hard ELO
$100kYTD
$984kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
hard
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Ficovich J.
7-5 6-3
Tomic B.
Ficovich J.
762
Tomic B.
530

Juan Pablo Ficovich defeated Bernard Tomic 7-5 6-3 in the Acapulco CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ficovich J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ficovich J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ficovich J.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (155 vs 153). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ficovich J.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
16
53
Break points saved·Clear edge
76
92
Break points won·Slight edge
9
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
27
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
5
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ficovich J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Tomic B.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.6Hard Elo 1419
Surface ELO
5.4+23 Hard Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1415
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1475
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.5
Surface form
5.6
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.4
Minutes 14d
6.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ficovich J.Tomic B.
Freshness·Even
86
84

Ficovich J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d) · Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Mpetshi Perricard G.[5]
Walton A.[4]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Walton A.[4]
Galarneau A.[6]
6-47-63
Mpetshi Perricard G.[5]
Svajda Z.[3]
6-26-0
Quarter-finals
Svajda Z.[3]
Cressy M.[8]
W/O
Walton A.[4]
Schoolkate T.
6-26-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.[5]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-16-4
Galarneau A.[6]
Hijikata R.[1]
6-07-5
R16
Galarneau A.[6]
Vallejo A.
7-676-1
Schoolkate T.
Zhukayev B.[7]
5-76-36-4
Walton A.[4]
Mchugh A.
6-16-0
Svajda Z.[3]
Oliveira G.
6-47-5
Hijikata R.[1]
Artnak B.
7-656-3
Cressy M.[8]
Ficovich J.
6-36-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.[5]
Brouwer G.
7-57-5
Pacheco Mendez R.
Mejia N.
6-36-3
R32
Brouwer G.
Palan D.
6-16-4
Hijikata R.[1]
Bicknell B.
4-66-26-3
Artnak B.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-2
Mchugh A.
Seggerman R.
6-36-2
Mpetshi Perricard G.[5]
Jasika O.
3-66-36-3
Galarneau A.[6]
Fanselow S.
6-36-2
Schoolkate T.
Mayo A.
5-77-636-1
Oliveira G.
Sell K.
6-36-3
Zhukayev B.[7]
Bellier A.
7-56-4
Vallejo A.
Escobedo E.
6-46-0
Walton A.[4]
Broom C.
6-26-3
Cressy M.[8]
Ponwith N.
6-46-0
Ficovich J.
Tomic B.
7-56-3
Svajda Z.[3]
Ilagan A.
6-36-2
Mejia N.
Janvier M.
2-67-57-5
Pacheco Mendez R.
Mmoh M.[2]
6-37-66