Alibek Kachmazov vs Antoine Escoffier — Gwangju CH Round of 32

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
RUS
Alibek Kachmazov
#782ATP
1490ELO
1467Hard ELO
23 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
hard
FRA
Antoine Escoffier
#753ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Kachmazov A.
7-5 6-4
Escoffier A.
Kachmazov A.
762
Escoffier A.
540

Alibek Kachmazov defeated Antoine Escoffier 7-5 6-4 in the Gwangju CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kachmazov A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Escoffier A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kachmazov A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kachmazov A.Escoffier A.
1st serve in·Even
56%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.0
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (99 vs 93). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kachmazov A.Escoffier A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
10
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
68
Break points won·Even
16
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
61
12
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kachmazov A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Escoffier A.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.7+53 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Hard Elo 1413
5.7Overall Elo 1490
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1436
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
3.4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
8.2
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.[6]
Yunchaokete B.[5]
6-23-66-4
Semi-finals
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Berankis R.
4-66-47-65
Harris L.[6]
Wu T.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Harris L.[6]
Shimabukuro S.[3]
6-16-3
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Hsu Y.
7-56-3
Berankis R.
Lajal M.
6-26-746-3
Wu T.
Kachmazov A.
6-35-77-63
R16
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Fery A.
6-36-784-4
Berankis R.
Mccabe J.
7-667-66
Hsu Y.
Bolt A.
6-46-4
Harris L.[6]
Chung Y.
6-46-4
Lajal M.
Sekulic P.
7-646-4
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Hong S.
6-46-4
Wu T.
Wong C.[8]
6-31-67-5
Kachmazov A.
Nam J.
6-46-3
R32
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Blockx A.
3-2
Sekulic P.
Bellucci M.[4]
0-66-17-5
Wu T.
Sweeny D.
4-66-36-3
Wong C.[8]
Echargui M.
6-767-56-3
Fery A.
Sun F.
6-43-66-3
Kachmazov A.
Escoffier A.
7-56-4
Berankis R.
Gerasimov E.
7-666-1
Hsu Y.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-36-766-1
Bolt A.
Marie J.
6-33-67-64
Lajal M.
Lee D.
6-16-1
Mccabe J.
Tu L.[7]
4-66-46-1
Harris L.[6]
Saville L.
6-26-2
Chung Y.
Jubb P.
6-44-66-3
Hong S.
Marchenko I.
6-36-2
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Lee J.
6-36-2
Nam J.
Virtanen O.[2]
6-46-3