Gerald Melzer vs Kyle Edmund — Tallahassee CH Round of 32

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUT
Gerald Melzer
36 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
clay
GBR
Kyle Edmund
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLLW
Melzer G.
6-4 6-1
Edmund K.
Melzer G.
662
Edmund K.
410

Gerald Melzer defeated Kyle Edmund 6-4 6-1 in the Tallahassee CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Kyle Edmund came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Gerald Melzer claimed a first win over Kyle Edmund in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-05-24Roland GarrosQ1clayKyle Edmund3-6 6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Melzer G.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Edmund K.

Edmund K.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Melzer G.

Serve advantage — Edmund K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Melzer G.Edmund K.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
53%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (19 vs 51). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Melzer G.Edmund K.
Clutch Rating·Even
34
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
77
92
Break points won·Even
20
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
53
25
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
29
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Melzer G.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Edmund K.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
5.4
Surface form
2.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
8.5
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bergs Z.[2]
Krueger M.
6-47-69
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.[2]
Hemery C.
3-66-44-1
Krueger M.
Kozlov S.
6-33-66-1
Quarter-finals
Hemery C.
Ritschard A.[7]
7-56-736-4
Krueger M.
Schwaerzler J.
7-57-64
Kozlov S.
Crawford O.
6-26-2
Bergs Z.[2]
Melzer G.
6-16-4
R16
Bergs Z.[2]
Tabur C.
7-645-76-3
Schwaerzler J.
Searle H.
6-17-65
Krueger M.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-636-2
Crawford O.
Habib H.
6-36-4
Kozlov S.
Sandgren T.
6-26-756-1
Ritschard A.[7]
Bobrov B.
6-33-66-1
Hemery C.
Denolly C.
6-36-2
Melzer G.
Gomez F.
4-67-687-66
R32
Hemery C.
Kypson P.[3]
7-626-3
Ritschard A.[7]
Kuzuhara B.
6-47-5
Bobrov B.
Bigun K.
4-66-26-4
Kozlov S.
Campana Lee G.
4-66-36-0
Searle H.
Wolf J.[1]
7-57-66
Schwaerzler J.
Fonio G.
6-26-4
Krueger M.
Quinn E.
6-17-62
Kwiatkowski T.
Boyer T.[8]
2-66-26-4
Habib H.
Kudla D.[4]
7-666-4
Crawford O.
Popko D.
6-07-62
Sandgren T.
Damm M.[6]
7-56-3
Denolly C.
Vale D.
6-47-60
Gomez F.
Andrade A.
6-46-4
Melzer G.
Edmund K.
6-46-1
Tabur C.
Lilov V.
6-16-1
Bergs Z.[2]
Kodat T.
6-46-2