Corentin Denolly vs Duarte Vale — Tallahassee CH Round of 32

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Corentin Denolly
#439ATP
1331ELO
1293Clay ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
clay
POR
Duarte Vale
#1243ATP
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLL
Denolly C.
6-4 7-6
Vale D.
Denolly C.
6772
Vale D.
4600

Corentin Denolly defeated Duarte Vale 6-4 7-6 in the Tallahassee CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Denolly C.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Vale D.

Vale D.serving58% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Denolly C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Denolly C.Vale D.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
39%
Service points won·Even
58%
54%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Clear edge
61%
46%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
1.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.7
6.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 18). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Denolly C.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Vale D.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
1.9
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
7.4
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bergs Z.[2]
Krueger M.
6-47-69
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.[2]
Hemery C.
3-66-44-1
Krueger M.
Kozlov S.
6-33-66-1
Quarter-finals
Hemery C.
Ritschard A.[7]
7-56-736-4
Krueger M.
Schwaerzler J.
7-57-64
Kozlov S.
Crawford O.
6-26-2
Bergs Z.[2]
Melzer G.
6-16-4
R16
Bergs Z.[2]
Tabur C.
7-645-76-3
Schwaerzler J.
Searle H.
6-17-65
Krueger M.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-636-2
Crawford O.
Habib H.
6-36-4
Kozlov S.
Sandgren T.
6-26-756-1
Ritschard A.[7]
Bobrov B.
6-33-66-1
Hemery C.
Denolly C.
6-36-2
Melzer G.
Gomez F.
4-67-687-66
R32
Hemery C.
Kypson P.[3]
7-626-3
Ritschard A.[7]
Kuzuhara B.
6-47-5
Bobrov B.
Bigun K.
4-66-26-4
Kozlov S.
Campana Lee G.
4-66-36-0
Searle H.
Wolf J.[1]
7-57-66
Schwaerzler J.
Fonio G.
6-26-4
Krueger M.
Quinn E.
6-17-62
Kwiatkowski T.
Boyer T.[8]
2-66-26-4
Habib H.
Kudla D.[4]
7-666-4
Crawford O.
Popko D.
6-07-62
Sandgren T.
Damm M.[6]
7-56-3
Denolly C.
Vale D.
6-47-60
Gomez F.
Andrade A.
6-46-4
Melzer G.
Edmund K.
6-46-1
Tabur C.
Lilov V.
6-16-1
Bergs Z.[2]
Kodat T.
6-46-2