Oliver Crawford vs Hady Habib — Tallahassee CH Round of 16

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Oliver Crawford
GBR
Oliver Crawford
#235ATP
1444ELO
1373Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
clay
LIB
Hady Habib
#650ATP
1412ELO
1435Clay ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Crawford O.
6-3 6-4
Habib H.
Crawford O.
662
Habib H.
340

Oliver Crawford defeated Hady Habib 6-3 6-4 in the Tallahassee CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Crawford O.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Habib H.

Habib H.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Crawford O.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Crawford O.Habib H.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.9
8.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (87 vs 111). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Crawford O.Habib H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
12
44
Break points saved·Dominant
64
92
Break points won·Clear edge
18
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
19
56
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Crawford O.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Habib H.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.2Clay Elo 1373
Surface ELO
5.8+62 Clay Elo edge
5.3Overall Elo 1444
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1412
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
5.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bergs Z.[2]
Krueger M.
6-47-69
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.[2]
Hemery C.
3-66-44-1
Krueger M.
Kozlov S.
6-33-66-1
Quarter-finals
Hemery C.
Ritschard A.[7]
7-56-736-4
Krueger M.
Schwaerzler J.
7-57-64
Kozlov S.
Crawford O.
6-26-2
Bergs Z.[2]
Melzer G.
6-16-4
R16
Bergs Z.[2]
Tabur C.
7-645-76-3
Schwaerzler J.
Searle H.
6-17-65
Krueger M.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-636-2
Crawford O.
Habib H.
6-36-4
Kozlov S.
Sandgren T.
6-26-756-1
Ritschard A.[7]
Bobrov B.
6-33-66-1
Hemery C.
Denolly C.
6-36-2
Melzer G.
Gomez F.
4-67-687-66
R32
Hemery C.
Kypson P.[3]
7-626-3
Ritschard A.[7]
Kuzuhara B.
6-47-5
Bobrov B.
Bigun K.
4-66-26-4
Kozlov S.
Campana Lee G.
4-66-36-0
Searle H.
Wolf J.[1]
7-57-66
Schwaerzler J.
Fonio G.
6-26-4
Krueger M.
Quinn E.
6-17-62
Kwiatkowski T.
Boyer T.[8]
2-66-26-4
Habib H.
Kudla D.[4]
7-666-4
Crawford O.
Popko D.
6-07-62
Sandgren T.
Damm M.[6]
7-56-3
Denolly C.
Vale D.
6-47-60
Gomez F.
Andrade A.
6-46-4
Melzer G.
Edmund K.
6-46-1
Tabur C.
Lilov V.
6-16-1
Bergs Z.[2]
Kodat T.
6-46-2