Francisco Comesana vs Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna — Oeiras CH Round of 32

Oeiras CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Francisco Comesana
ARG4
Francisco Comesana
#94ATP
1695ELO
1656Clay ELO
$580kYTD
$2.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
clay
Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna
ARG
Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna
1331ELO
1322Clay ELO
26 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
Comesana F.
6-2 5-7 6-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Comesana F.
6562
Rodriguez Taverna S.
2731

Francisco Comesana defeated Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna 6-2 5-7 6-3 in the Oeiras CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Comesana F.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Rodriguez Taverna S.

Rodriguez Taverna S.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Comesana F.

Serve advantage — Comesana F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Comesana F.Rodriguez Taverna S.
40
Serve
—
16
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Comesana F.Rodriguez Taverna S.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.5
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (148 vs 134). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Comesana F.Rodriguez Taverna S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
38
Break points saved·Clear edge
90
72
Break points won·Dominant
36
4
Deciding sets·Even
79
76
Tiebreaks·Even
38
39

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Comesana F.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Rodriguez Taverna S.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.5+334 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.5Clay Elo 1322
8.8Overall Elo 1695
ELO gap
1.2Overall Elo 1331
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.1
Surface form
3.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
6.4
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Comesana F.Rodriguez Taverna S.
Freshness·Slight edge
90
82

Comesana F.: 11 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Rodriguez Taverna S.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 34 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Comesana F.[4]
Blanchet U.
6-43-67-5
Faria J.
Ymer E.
3-67-636-4
Semi-finals
Blanchet U.
Royer V.
6-46-2
Comesana F.[4]
Faria J.
5-77-646-0
Faria J.
Burruchaga R.[6]
6-46-756-1
Ymer E.
Yevseyev D.
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Comesana F.[4]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-36-4
Faria J.
Gaubas V.
6-47-65
Blanchet U.
Napolitano S.
4-66-16-4
Royer V.
Novak D.
7-671-66-3
Burruchaga R.[6]
De Loore J.
6-32-0
Yevseyev D.
Zhukayev B.
6-42-66-3
Faria J.
Novak D.
2-66-46-0
Ymer E.
Choinski J.
6-21-66-4
R16
Faria J.
Tseng C.
6-26-3
Royer V.
De Jong J.[9]
6-26-3
Gaubas V.
Atmane T.[6]
6-16-0
Napolitano S.
Fognini F.[1]
7-54-67-65
Blanchet U.
Nava E.[5]
6-47-63
Novak D.
Agamenone F.
6-36-1
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Elias G.
6-26-3
Comesana F.[4]
Ymer E.
1-66-47-66
Novak D.
Michelsen A.[1]
7-636-4
Zhukayev B.
Kypson P.[7]
7-57-65
Ymer E.
Harris L.[5]
7-56-3
Faria J.
Heide G.
6-46-4
De Loore J.
Kopriva V.[4]
6-41-66-3
Burruchaga R.[6]
Svrcina D.
6-36-4
Yevseyev D.
Nava E.[3]
7-686-0
Choinski J.
Boyer T.
6-47-5
R32
Elias G.
Kasnikowski M.
6-11-1
Ymer E.
Sachko V.
6-40-0
Novak D.
Cerundolo J.[8]
6-36-2
Blanchet U.
Rocha H.
6-37-61
Napolitano S.
Kovalik J.
7-616-2
Fognini F.[1]
De Loore J.
4-66-46-4
Nava E.[5]
Erhard M.
4-66-36-2
De Jong J.[9]
Onclin G.
6-36-2
Royer V.
Andreev A.
6-05-76-4
Agamenone F.
Blancaneaux G.
6-33-66-3
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Moreno De Alboran N.[7]
7-57-5
Comesana F.[4]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-25-76-3
Atmane T.[6]
Harris B.
2-66-36-4
Gaubas V.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-52-66-3
Tseng C.
Halys Q.
4-67-636-2
Faria J.
Monteiro T.[2]
6-23-67-62
Novak D.
Added D.
6-01-0
Zhukayev B.
Onclin G.
7-637-67
Svrcina D.
Cerundolo J.
4-67-622-0
Choinski J.
Svajda Z.[2]
6-36-0
Ymer E.
Quinn E.
6-36-4
Michelsen A.[1]
Rocha H.
4-66-36-4
Heide G.
Popko D.
6-16-2
Faria J.
Mochizuki S.[8]
6-26-4
Kopriva V.[4]
Ficovich J.
6-27-5
De Loore J.
Elias G.
6-44-66-3
Burruchaga R.[6]
Andreev A.
7-666-3
Kypson P.[7]
Wong C.
6-36-1
Yevseyev D.
Neumayer L.
3-67-56-0
Nava E.[3]
Berrettini J.
6-726-47-5
Harris L.[5]
Ferreira Silva F.
7-57-66
Boyer T.
Blanch D.
6-787-606-3