Adam Walton vs Charles Broom — Acapulco CH Round of 32

Acapulco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Adam Walton
AUS4
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
hard
GBR
Charles Broom
#283ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLL
Walton A.
6-2 6-3
Broom C.
Walton A.
662
Broom C.
230

Adam Walton defeated Charles Broom 6-2 6-3 in the Acapulco CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Adam Walton came in ranked #79.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Walton A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Broom C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Walton A.Broom C.
35
Serve
—
27
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Walton A.Broom C.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Even
6.2
6.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 84). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Walton A.Broom C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
12
Break points saved·Dominant
95
56
Break points won·Clear edge
20
0
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
42
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Walton A.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Broom C.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
7.7+273 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Hard Elo 1396
7.8Overall Elo 1703
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1409
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.2
Surface form
4.6
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.1
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Walton A.Broom C.
Freshness·Clear edge
54
77

Walton A.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d) · Broom C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Mpetshi Perricard G.[5]
Walton A.[4]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Walton A.[4]
Galarneau A.[6]
6-47-63
Mpetshi Perricard G.[5]
Svajda Z.[3]
6-26-0
Quarter-finals
Svajda Z.[3]
Cressy M.[8]
W/O
Walton A.[4]
Schoolkate T.
6-26-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.[5]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-16-4
Galarneau A.[6]
Hijikata R.[1]
6-07-5
R16
Galarneau A.[6]
Vallejo A.
7-676-1
Schoolkate T.
Zhukayev B.[7]
5-76-36-4
Walton A.[4]
Mchugh A.
6-16-0
Svajda Z.[3]
Oliveira G.
6-47-5
Hijikata R.[1]
Artnak B.
7-656-3
Cressy M.[8]
Ficovich J.
6-36-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.[5]
Brouwer G.
7-57-5
Pacheco Mendez R.
Mejia N.
6-36-3
R32
Brouwer G.
Palan D.
6-16-4
Hijikata R.[1]
Bicknell B.
4-66-26-3
Artnak B.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-2
Mchugh A.
Seggerman R.
6-36-2
Mpetshi Perricard G.[5]
Jasika O.
3-66-36-3
Galarneau A.[6]
Fanselow S.
6-36-2
Schoolkate T.
Mayo A.
5-77-636-1
Oliveira G.
Sell K.
6-36-3
Zhukayev B.[7]
Bellier A.
7-56-4
Vallejo A.
Escobedo E.
6-46-0
Walton A.[4]
Broom C.
6-26-3
Cressy M.[8]
Ponwith N.
6-46-0
Ficovich J.
Tomic B.
7-56-3
Svajda Z.[3]
Ilagan A.
6-36-2
Mejia N.
Janvier M.
2-67-57-5
Pacheco Mendez R.
Mmoh M.[2]
6-37-66