Yu Hsiou Hsu vs Alex Bolt — Gwangju CH Round of 16

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Yu Hsiou Hsu
TPE
Yu Hsiou Hsu
#210ATP
1489ELO
1468Hard ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
hard
Alex Bolt
AUS
Alex Bolt
#166ATP
1588ELO
1541Hard ELO
$125kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
33 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
Hsu Y.
6-4 6-4
Bolt A.
Hsu Y.
662
Bolt A.
440

Yu Hsiou Hsu defeated Alex Bolt 6-4 6-4 in the Gwangju CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Yu Hsiou Hsu edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hsu Y.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Bolt A.

Bolt A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Hsu Y.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hsu Y.Bolt A.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.2
7.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (128 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hsu Y.Bolt A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
36
44
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
93
Break points won·Even
4
7
Deciding sets·Even
50
46
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
77
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hsu Y.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Bolt A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.1Hard Elo 1468
Surface ELO
5.9+72 Hard Elo edge
3.9Overall Elo 1489
ELO gap
6.1Overall Elo 1588
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.5
Surface form
5.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
9.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.[6]
Yunchaokete B.[5]
6-23-66-4
Semi-finals
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Berankis R.
4-66-47-65
Harris L.[6]
Wu T.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Harris L.[6]
Shimabukuro S.[3]
6-16-3
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Hsu Y.
7-56-3
Berankis R.
Lajal M.
6-26-746-3
Wu T.
Kachmazov A.
6-35-77-63
R16
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Fery A.
6-36-784-4
Berankis R.
Mccabe J.
7-667-66
Hsu Y.
Bolt A.
6-46-4
Harris L.[6]
Chung Y.
6-46-4
Lajal M.
Sekulic P.
7-646-4
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Hong S.
6-46-4
Wu T.
Wong C.[8]
6-31-67-5
Kachmazov A.
Nam J.
6-46-3
R32
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Blockx A.
3-2
Sekulic P.
Bellucci M.[4]
0-66-17-5
Wu T.
Sweeny D.
4-66-36-3
Wong C.[8]
Echargui M.
6-767-56-3
Fery A.
Sun F.
6-43-66-3
Kachmazov A.
Escoffier A.
7-56-4
Berankis R.
Gerasimov E.
7-666-1
Hsu Y.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-36-766-1
Bolt A.
Marie J.
6-33-67-64
Lajal M.
Lee D.
6-16-1
Mccabe J.
Tu L.[7]
4-66-46-1
Harris L.[6]
Saville L.
6-26-2
Chung Y.
Jubb P.
6-44-66-3
Hong S.
Marchenko I.
6-36-2
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Lee J.
6-36-2
Nam J.
Virtanen O.[2]
6-46-3