Ugo Blanchet vs Emilio Nava — Oeiras CH Round of 16

Oeiras CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
FRA
Ugo Blanchet
#174ATP
1521ELO
1440Clay ELO
$119kYTD
$989kCAREER
27 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
clay
Emilio Nava
USA5
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Blanchet U.
6-4 7-6
Nava E.
Blanchet U.
6772
Nava E.
4630

Ugo Blanchet defeated Emilio Nava 6-4 7-6 in the Oeiras CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Blanchet U.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Blanchet U.

Serve advantage — Nava E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Blanchet U.Nava E.
—
Serve
22
—
Return
1

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Blanchet U.Nava E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.0
7.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (131 vs 189). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Blanchet U.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
34
52
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
94
Break points won·Even
15
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
12
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Blanchet U.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Nava E.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
2.2Clay Elo 1440
Surface ELO
7.8+246 Clay Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1521
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
7.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Blanchet U.Nava E.
Freshness·
—
100

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Comesana F.[4]
Blanchet U.
6-43-67-5
Faria J.
Ymer E.
3-67-636-4
Semi-finals
Blanchet U.
Royer V.
6-46-2
Comesana F.[4]
Faria J.
5-77-646-0
Faria J.
Burruchaga R.[6]
6-46-756-1
Ymer E.
Yevseyev D.
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Comesana F.[4]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-36-4
Faria J.
Gaubas V.
6-47-65
Blanchet U.
Napolitano S.
4-66-16-4
Royer V.
Novak D.
7-671-66-3
Burruchaga R.[6]
De Loore J.
6-32-0
Yevseyev D.
Zhukayev B.
6-42-66-3
Faria J.
Novak D.
2-66-46-0
Ymer E.
Choinski J.
6-21-66-4
R16
Faria J.
Tseng C.
6-26-3
Royer V.
De Jong J.[9]
6-26-3
Gaubas V.
Atmane T.[6]
6-16-0
Napolitano S.
Fognini F.[1]
7-54-67-65
Blanchet U.
Nava E.[5]
6-47-63
Novak D.
Agamenone F.
6-36-1
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Elias G.
6-26-3
Comesana F.[4]
Ymer E.
1-66-47-66
Novak D.
Michelsen A.[1]
7-636-4
Zhukayev B.
Kypson P.[7]
7-57-65
Ymer E.
Harris L.[5]
7-56-3
Faria J.
Heide G.
6-46-4
De Loore J.
Kopriva V.[4]
6-41-66-3
Burruchaga R.[6]
Svrcina D.
6-36-4
Yevseyev D.
Nava E.[3]
7-686-0
Choinski J.
Boyer T.
6-47-5
R32
Elias G.
Kasnikowski M.
6-11-1
Ymer E.
Sachko V.
6-40-0
Novak D.
Cerundolo J.[8]
6-36-2
Blanchet U.
Rocha H.
6-37-61
Napolitano S.
Kovalik J.
7-616-2
Fognini F.[1]
De Loore J.
4-66-46-4
Nava E.[5]
Erhard M.
4-66-36-2
De Jong J.[9]
Onclin G.
6-36-2
Royer V.
Andreev A.
6-05-76-4
Agamenone F.
Blancaneaux G.
6-33-66-3
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Moreno De Alboran N.[7]
7-57-5
Comesana F.[4]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-25-76-3
Atmane T.[6]
Harris B.
2-66-36-4
Gaubas V.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-52-66-3
Tseng C.
Halys Q.
4-67-636-2
Faria J.
Monteiro T.[2]
6-23-67-62
Novak D.
Added D.
6-01-0
Zhukayev B.
Onclin G.
7-637-67
Svrcina D.
Cerundolo J.
4-67-622-0
Choinski J.
Svajda Z.[2]
6-36-0
Ymer E.
Quinn E.
6-36-4
Michelsen A.[1]
Rocha H.
4-66-36-4
Heide G.
Popko D.
6-16-2
Faria J.
Mochizuki S.[8]
6-26-4
Kopriva V.[4]
Ficovich J.
6-27-5
De Loore J.
Elias G.
6-44-66-3
Burruchaga R.[6]
Andreev A.
7-666-3
Kypson P.[7]
Wong C.
6-36-1
Yevseyev D.
Neumayer L.
3-67-56-0
Nava E.[3]
Berrettini J.
6-726-47-5
Harris L.[5]
Ferreira Silva F.
7-57-66
Boyer T.
Blanch D.
6-787-606-3