Zizou Bergs vs Clement Tabur — Tallahassee CH Round of 16

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Zizou Bergs
BEL2
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1696Clay ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
clay
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
Bergs Z.
7-6 5-7 6-3
Tabur C.
Bergs Z.
77562
Tabur C.
64731

Zizou Bergs defeated Clement Tabur 7-6 5-7 6-3 in the Tallahassee CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #35, defending the title.

Key context

  • Match story: Zizou Bergs closed it out in three sets, 7–6 5–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bergs Z.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Tabur C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bergs Z.Tabur C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.9
3.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (156 vs 130). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bergs Z.Tabur C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
69
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
74
Break points won·Even
21
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bergs Z.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Tabur C.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.1+143 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Clay Elo 1553
7.5Overall Elo 1808
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1607
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
3.7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
1.2
Minutes 14d
7.8
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bergs Z.Tabur C.
Freshness·Dominant
82
55

Bergs Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bergs Z.[2]
Krueger M.
6-47-69
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.[2]
Hemery C.
3-66-44-1
Krueger M.
Kozlov S.
6-33-66-1
Quarter-finals
Hemery C.
Ritschard A.[7]
7-56-736-4
Krueger M.
Schwaerzler J.
7-57-64
Kozlov S.
Crawford O.
6-26-2
Bergs Z.[2]
Melzer G.
6-16-4
R16
Bergs Z.[2]
Tabur C.
7-645-76-3
Schwaerzler J.
Searle H.
6-17-65
Krueger M.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-636-2
Crawford O.
Habib H.
6-36-4
Kozlov S.
Sandgren T.
6-26-756-1
Ritschard A.[7]
Bobrov B.
6-33-66-1
Hemery C.
Denolly C.
6-36-2
Melzer G.
Gomez F.
4-67-687-66
R32
Hemery C.
Kypson P.[3]
7-626-3
Ritschard A.[7]
Kuzuhara B.
6-47-5
Bobrov B.
Bigun K.
4-66-26-4
Kozlov S.
Campana Lee G.
4-66-36-0
Searle H.
Wolf J.[1]
7-57-66
Schwaerzler J.
Fonio G.
6-26-4
Krueger M.
Quinn E.
6-17-62
Kwiatkowski T.
Boyer T.[8]
2-66-26-4
Habib H.
Kudla D.[4]
7-666-4
Crawford O.
Popko D.
6-07-62
Sandgren T.
Damm M.[6]
7-56-3
Denolly C.
Vale D.
6-47-60
Gomez F.
Andrade A.
6-46-4
Melzer G.
Edmund K.
6-46-1
Tabur C.
Lilov V.
6-16-1
Bergs Z.[2]
Kodat T.
6-46-2