Ricardas Berankis vs Egor Gerasimov — Gwangju CH Round of 32

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
LTU
Ricardas Berankis
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2024
hard
BLR
Egor Gerasimov
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Berankis R.
7-6 6-1
Gerasimov E.
Berankis R.
7862
Gerasimov E.
6610

Ricardas Berankis defeated Egor Gerasimov 7-6 6-1 in the Gwangju CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Ricardas Berankis came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Ricardas Berankis came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Berankis R.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Gerasimov E.

Gerasimov E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Berankis R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Berankis R.Gerasimov E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.7
7.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (99 vs 77). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Berankis R.Gerasimov E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
58
44
Break points saved·Even
91
88
Break points won·Slight edge
16
8
Deciding sets·Slight edge
80
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Berankis R.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gerasimov E.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.7
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.[6]
Yunchaokete B.[5]
6-23-66-4
Semi-finals
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Berankis R.
4-66-47-65
Harris L.[6]
Wu T.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Harris L.[6]
Shimabukuro S.[3]
6-16-3
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Hsu Y.
7-56-3
Berankis R.
Lajal M.
6-26-746-3
Wu T.
Kachmazov A.
6-35-77-63
R16
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Fery A.
6-36-784-4
Berankis R.
Mccabe J.
7-667-66
Hsu Y.
Bolt A.
6-46-4
Harris L.[6]
Chung Y.
6-46-4
Lajal M.
Sekulic P.
7-646-4
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Hong S.
6-46-4
Wu T.
Wong C.[8]
6-31-67-5
Kachmazov A.
Nam J.
6-46-3
R32
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Blockx A.
3-2
Sekulic P.
Bellucci M.[4]
0-66-17-5
Wu T.
Sweeny D.
4-66-36-3
Wong C.[8]
Echargui M.
6-767-56-3
Fery A.
Sun F.
6-43-66-3
Kachmazov A.
Escoffier A.
7-56-4
Berankis R.
Gerasimov E.
7-666-1
Hsu Y.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-36-766-1
Bolt A.
Marie J.
6-33-67-64
Lajal M.
Lee D.
6-16-1
Mccabe J.
Tu L.[7]
4-66-46-1
Harris L.[6]
Saville L.
6-26-2
Chung Y.
Jubb P.
6-44-66-3
Hong S.
Marchenko I.
6-36-2
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Lee J.
6-36-2
Nam J.
Virtanen O.[2]
6-46-3