Beibit Zhukayev vs Benjamin Lock — Cuernavaca CH Round of 32

Cuernavaca CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
KAZ8
Beibit Zhukayev
#387ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 April 2024
hard
ZIM
Benjamin Lock
33 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Zhukayev B.
7-6 6-2
Lock B.
Zhukayev B.
7862
Lock B.
6620

Beibit Zhukayev defeated Benjamin Lock 7-6 6-2 in the Cuernavaca CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Beibit Zhukayev came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zhukayev B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Lock B.

Lock B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zhukayev B.Lock B.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
33%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.2
4.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (139 vs 33). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zhukayev B.Lock B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
31
0
Break points saved·Dominant
94
46
Break points won·Even
1
0
Deciding sets·Clear edge
25
3
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
63
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zhukayev B.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lock B.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
2.4
Surface form
0.9
Fatigue & Travel
1.6
Minutes 14d
5.3
4.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Mpetshi Perricard G.[5]
Mejia N.
7-57-5
Semi-finals
Mejia N.
Cressy M.[6]
7-667-65
Mpetshi Perricard G.[5]
Walton A.[4]
7-665-77-5
Quarter-finals
Walton A.[4]
Zhukayev B.[8]
7-636-756-4
Cressy M.[6]
Galarneau A.
6-47-65
Mejia N.
Pospisil V.
6-46-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.[5]
Janvier M.
6-37-64
R16
Mpetshi Perricard G.[5]
Mayo A.
7-666-4
Pospisil V.
Schoolkate T.
6-716-46-2
Galarneau A.
Mena F.
7-636-1
Cressy M.[6]
Ficovich J.
7-666-1
Mejia N.
Palan D.
7-56-3
Zhukayev B.[8]
Langmo C.
6-37-65
Walton A.[4]
Bellier A.
7-6116-4
Janvier M.
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-653-66-3
R32
Galarneau A.
Hijikata R.[1]
7-51-0
Mpetshi Perricard G.[5]
Escobedo E.
7-657-63
Cressy M.[6]
Fanselow S.
6-36-3
Mena F.
Mansouri S.
7-656-2
Ficovich J.
Oliveira G.
6-47-5
Palan D.
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Mayo A.
Jasika O.
7-616-3
Walton A.[4]
Ayeni O.
6-36-1
Mejia N.
Svajda Z.[3]
0-66-36-0
Schoolkate T.
Pannu K.
6-46-756-3
Pospisil V.
Brouwer G.[7]
6-16-2
Zhukayev B.[8]
Lock B.
7-666-2
Langmo C.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-46-4
Bellier A.
Smith K.
6-46-3
Janvier M.
Mchugh A.
4-67-617-66
Pacheco Mendez R.
Tirante T.[2]
7-56-4