Mikhail Kukushkin vs Albert Ramos — Madrid CH Quarter-final

Madrid CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ8
Mikhail Kukushkin
#316ATP
1552ELO
1518Clay ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 April 2024
clay
ESP2
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Kukushkin M.
7-6 4-6 7-6
Ramos A.
Kukushkin M.
774772
Ramos A.
636651

Mikhail Kukushkin defeated Albert Ramos 7-6 4-6 7-6 in the Madrid CH quarter-final on clay. Mikhail Kukushkin extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-10-08Shanghai MastersR64hardMikhail Kukushkin6-4 6-2
2018-05-28Roland GarrosR128clayAlbert Ramos7-6(0) 6-4 6-1
2015-04-06CasablancaR32clayMikhail Kukushkin6-1 2-6 6-3
2011-09-26Kuala LumpurR32hardAlbert Ramos4-6 6-3 4-2 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Kukushkin M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Ramos A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Serve advantage — Kukushkin M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kukushkin M.Ramos A.
1st serve in·Even
66%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
1.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.0
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (164 vs 89). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kukushkin M.Ramos A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
46
59
Break points saved·Even
93
95
Break points won·Slight edge
41
49
Deciding sets·Dominant
41
80
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
44
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kukushkin M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Ramos A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.0Clay Elo 1518
Surface ELO
5.0+8 Clay Elo edge
5.1Overall Elo 1552
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1558
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.1
Surface form
4.0
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
8.2
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Napolitano S.
Riedi L.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Napolitano S.
Kukushkin M.[8]
6-24-1
Riedi L.
Rodionov J.[6]
4-66-37-63
Quarter-finals
Napolitano S.
Huesler M.
6-27-65
Rodionov J.[6]
Hassan B.
6-16-4
Riedi L.
Fonseca J.
6-37-64
Kukushkin M.[8]
Ramos A.[2]
7-634-67-65
R16
Ramos A.[2]
Roca Batalla O.
7-626-4
Napolitano S.
Kopriva V.[5]
7-677-5
Hassan B.
Zeppieri G.
3-66-36-2
Rodionov J.[6]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-46-2
Riedi L.
Sachko V.
6-36-2
Fonseca J.
Mayot H.[7]
6-23-66-3
Huesler M.
Shang J.[4]
6-43-67-5
Kukushkin M.[8]
Molleker R.
6-716-16-1
R32
Hassan B.
Taberner C.
6-40-66-4
Roca Batalla O.
Paire B.
4-66-34-2
Riedi L.
Buse I.
6-37-5
Molleker R.
Hardt N.
6-36-4
Ramos A.[2]
Shelbayh A.
6-11-66-2
Kopriva V.[5]
Landaluce M.
6-36-3
Huesler M.
Grenier H.
6-26-2
Kukushkin M.[8]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-46-4
Shang J.[4]
Moro Canas A.
7-56-2
Napolitano S.
Gaubas V.
6-36-2
Zeppieri G.
Daniel T.[1]
6-717-56-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Rincon D.
6-37-5
Rodionov J.[6]
Yevseyev D.
6-32-66-4
Sachko V.
Passaro F.
6-34-67-5
Fonseca J.
Andreozzi G.
4-66-46-2
Mayot H.[7]
De Loore J.
6-21-67-64