Paul Jubb vs Tung Lin Wu — Busan CH Round of 16

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GBR
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1403Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 April 2024
hard
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWL
Jubb P.
6-4 7-6
Wu T.
Jubb P.
6772
Wu T.
4610

Paul Jubb defeated Tung Lin Wu 6-4 7-6 in the Busan CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tung Lin Wu came in ranked #329, defending last year's round of 32, but Paul Jubb had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 4 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jubb P.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jubb P.Wu T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Even
4.0
3.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 131). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jubb P.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
37
10
Break points saved·Even
84
84
Break points won·Even
6
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
44
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jubb P.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Wu T.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0+27 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.0Hard Elo 1376
4.9Overall Elo 1426
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1406
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
8.0
Surface form
2.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jubb P.Wu T.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
88

Jubb P.: 19 days rest · Wu T.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Uchiyama Y.
Hong S.
7-646-3
Semi-finals
Hong S.
Kwon S.
W/O
Uchiyama Y.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-34-67-64
Quarter-finals
Hong S.
Wong C.[8]
6-43-66-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Marchenko I.
7-653-66-3
Uchiyama Y.
Jubb P.
4-67-56-3
Kwon S.
Harris L.[6]
7-657-5
R16
Duckworth J.[1]
Fery A.
4-66-16-4
Harris L.[6]
Sekulic P.
6-47-63
Marchenko I.
Noguchi R.
6-26-3
Uchiyama Y.
Sweeny D.
6-24-66-1
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-47-61
Kwon S.
Kachmazov A.
6-46-3
Wong C.[8]
Ellis B.
7-56-2
Hong S.
Lajal M.
6-46-4
R32
Kwon S.
Bellucci M.[4]
6-46-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Roh H.
6-36-3
Sekulic P.
Nam J.
6-16-4
Fery A.
Marie J.
6-26-1
Marchenko I.
Bolt A.
6-17-61
Noguchi R.
Yunchaokete B.[5]
7-57-5
Uchiyama Y.
Shimabukuro S.[3]
6-36-0
Sweeny D.
Erel Y.
4-66-46-4
Wu T.
Hsu Y.
6-46-3
Jubb P.
Tu L.[7]
7-636-1
Harris L.[6]
Berankis R.
6-36-1
Kachmazov A.
Celikbilek A.
6-44-66-3
Wong C.[8]
Blockx A.
6-36-3
Ellis B.
Escoffier A.
6-716-37-64
Lajal M.
Chung Y.
6-36-2
Hong S.
Virtanen O.[2]
6-26-2