Filip Misolic vs Michael Geerts — Split CH Round of 16

Split CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Filip Misolic
AUT8
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 April 2024
clay
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1348Clay ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Misolic F.
6-4 7-6
Geerts M.
Misolic F.
6792
Geerts M.
4670

Filip Misolic defeated Michael Geerts 6-4 7-6 in the Split CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Filip Misolic came in ranked #293, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Geerts M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Geerts M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
4.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (120 vs 134). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Geerts M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
79
9
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
82
Break points won·Dominant
53
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Geerts M.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.9+316 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.1Clay Elo 1348
7.2Overall Elo 1587
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1400
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
4.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
3.7
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Misolic F.Geerts M.
Freshness·
—
89

Geerts M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Kovalik J.
Piros Z.[1]
6-45-77-5
Semi-finals
Piros Z.[1]
Dodig M.
6-36-3
Kovalik J.
Bonzi B.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Piros Z.[1]
Misolic F.[8]
6-46-1
Dodig M.
Moller E.
6-26-0
Kovalik J.
Travaglia S.
6-47-62
Bonzi B.
Squire H.
4-66-36-4
R16
Dodig M.
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-4
Kovalik J.
Halys Q.[4]
6-23-66-4
Moller E.
Lamasine T.
6-16-3
Piros Z.[1]
Neumayer L.
6-36-2
Misolic F.[8]
Geerts M.
6-47-67
Travaglia S.
Topo M.
6-46-2
Squire H.
Mikrut L.
6-36-4
Bonzi B.
Ajdukovic D.[2]
6-34-67-65
R32
Squire H.
Nicod J.
6-27-64
Squire H.
Nicod J.
6-27-64
Travaglia S.
Cerundolo J.[5]
3-66-44-0
Misolic F.[8]
Harris B.
7-56-3
Bonzi B.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-26-2
Lamasine T.
Vesely J.
6-36-4
Kovalik J.
Ionel N.
6-46-1
Geerts M.
Rottoli L.
7-626-1
Dodig M.
Molcan A.[7]
6-26-4
Neumayer L.
Erhard M.
6-36-2
Piros Z.[1]
Fatic N.
4-66-36-1
Moller E.
Klein L.[3]
7-636-3
Kasnikowski M.
Kolar Z.
6-16-2
Topo M.
Gill F.
6-27-62
Halys Q.[4]
Gakhov I.
6-36-4
Mikrut L.
Dzumhur D.[6]
6-06-1
Ajdukovic D.[2]
Forejtek J.
6-777-56-1