Zsombor Piros vs Nerman Fatic — Split CH Round of 32

Split CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Zsombor Piros
HUN1
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 April 2024
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Piros Z.
4-6 6-3 6-1
Fatic N.
Piros Z.
4662
Fatic N.
6311

Zsombor Piros defeated Nerman Fatic 4-6 6-3 6-1 in the Split CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120, defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Serve advantage — Piros Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.0
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (138 vs 92). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
84
63
Break points won·Even
32
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
24
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
48
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Fatic N.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+142 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Clay Elo 1478
7.6Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1496
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.1
Surface form
2.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
8.3
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Fatic N.
Freshness·
54
—

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Kovalik J.
Piros Z.[1]
6-45-77-5
Semi-finals
Piros Z.[1]
Dodig M.
6-36-3
Kovalik J.
Bonzi B.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Piros Z.[1]
Misolic F.[8]
6-46-1
Dodig M.
Moller E.
6-26-0
Kovalik J.
Travaglia S.
6-47-62
Bonzi B.
Squire H.
4-66-36-4
R16
Dodig M.
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-4
Kovalik J.
Halys Q.[4]
6-23-66-4
Moller E.
Lamasine T.
6-16-3
Piros Z.[1]
Neumayer L.
6-36-2
Misolic F.[8]
Geerts M.
6-47-67
Travaglia S.
Topo M.
6-46-2
Squire H.
Mikrut L.
6-36-4
Bonzi B.
Ajdukovic D.[2]
6-34-67-65
R32
Squire H.
Nicod J.
6-27-64
Squire H.
Nicod J.
6-27-64
Travaglia S.
Cerundolo J.[5]
3-66-44-0
Misolic F.[8]
Harris B.
7-56-3
Bonzi B.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-26-2
Lamasine T.
Vesely J.
6-36-4
Kovalik J.
Ionel N.
6-46-1
Geerts M.
Rottoli L.
7-626-1
Dodig M.
Molcan A.[7]
6-26-4
Neumayer L.
Erhard M.
6-36-2
Piros Z.[1]
Fatic N.
4-66-36-1
Moller E.
Klein L.[3]
7-636-3
Kasnikowski M.
Kolar Z.
6-16-2
Topo M.
Gill F.
6-27-62
Halys Q.[4]
Gakhov I.
6-36-4
Mikrut L.
Dzumhur D.[6]
6-06-1
Ajdukovic D.[2]
Forejtek J.
6-777-56-1