Coleman Wong vs Blake Ellis — Busan CH Round of 16

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
HKG8
Coleman Wong
#111ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 April 2024
hard
AUS
Blake Ellis
#472ATP
1416ELO
1390Hard ELO
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
Wong C.
7-5 6-2
Ellis B.
Wong C.
762
Ellis B.
520

Coleman Wong defeated Blake Ellis 7-5 6-2 in the Busan CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Coleman Wong came in ranked #111.

Key context

  • Match story: Coleman Wong closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wong C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Ellis B.

Ellis B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wong C.Ellis B.
37
Serve
—
34
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wong C.Ellis B.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Even
8.4
8.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wong C.Ellis B.
Clutch Rating·Even
43
41
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
79
Break points won·Even
5
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
88
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wong C.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Ellis B.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
7.6+202 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Hard Elo 1390
7.8Overall Elo 1602
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1416
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
3.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wong C.Ellis B.
Freshness·Even
89
92

Wong C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Ellis B.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Uchiyama Y.
Hong S.
7-646-3
Semi-finals
Hong S.
Kwon S.
W/O
Uchiyama Y.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-34-67-64
Quarter-finals
Hong S.
Wong C.[8]
6-43-66-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Marchenko I.
7-653-66-3
Uchiyama Y.
Jubb P.
4-67-56-3
Kwon S.
Harris L.[6]
7-657-5
R16
Duckworth J.[1]
Fery A.
4-66-16-4
Harris L.[6]
Sekulic P.
6-47-63
Marchenko I.
Noguchi R.
6-26-3
Uchiyama Y.
Sweeny D.
6-24-66-1
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-47-61
Kwon S.
Kachmazov A.
6-46-3
Wong C.[8]
Ellis B.
7-56-2
Hong S.
Lajal M.
6-46-4
R32
Kwon S.
Bellucci M.[4]
6-46-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Roh H.
6-36-3
Sekulic P.
Nam J.
6-16-4
Fery A.
Marie J.
6-26-1
Marchenko I.
Bolt A.
6-17-61
Noguchi R.
Yunchaokete B.[5]
7-57-5
Uchiyama Y.
Shimabukuro S.[3]
6-36-0
Sweeny D.
Erel Y.
4-66-46-4
Wu T.
Hsu Y.
6-46-3
Jubb P.
Tu L.[7]
7-636-1
Harris L.[6]
Berankis R.
6-36-1
Kachmazov A.
Celikbilek A.
6-44-66-3
Wong C.[8]
Blockx A.
6-36-3
Ellis B.
Escoffier A.
6-716-37-64
Lajal M.
Chung Y.
6-36-2
Hong S.
Virtanen O.[2]
6-26-2