Luka Mikrut vs Damir Dzumhur — Split CH Round of 32

Split CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CRO
Luka Mikrut
#172ATP
1597ELO
1619Clay ELO
$79kYTD
$252kCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 April 2024
clay
Damir Dzumhur
BIH6
Damir Dzumhur
#108ATP
1638ELO
1594Clay ELO
$528kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
34 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWWLLW
Mikrut L.
6-0 6-1
Dzumhur D.
Mikrut L.
662
Dzumhur D.
010

Luka Mikrut defeated Damir Dzumhur 6-0 6-1 in the Split CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Damir Dzumhur came in ranked #108, but Luka Mikrut had been the form player, winning 5 of their last 6 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mikrut L.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Dzumhur D.

Dzumhur D.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Mikrut L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Mikrut L.Dzumhur D.
—
Serve
0
—
Return
58

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mikrut L.Dzumhur D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.7
1.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 167). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mikrut L.Dzumhur D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
54
70
Break points saved·Slight edge
77
87
Break points won·Dominant
29
64
Deciding sets·Even
81
80
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
59
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mikrut L.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Dzumhur D.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.7+25 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.3Clay Elo 1594
3.9Overall Elo 1597
ELO gap
6.1Overall Elo 1638
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
9.3
0.0
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.5
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mikrut L.Dzumhur D.
Freshness·
—
76

Dzumhur D.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 58 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Kovalik J.
Piros Z.[1]
6-45-77-5
Semi-finals
Piros Z.[1]
Dodig M.
6-36-3
Kovalik J.
Bonzi B.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Piros Z.[1]
Misolic F.[8]
6-46-1
Dodig M.
Moller E.
6-26-0
Kovalik J.
Travaglia S.
6-47-62
Bonzi B.
Squire H.
4-66-36-4
R16
Dodig M.
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-4
Kovalik J.
Halys Q.[4]
6-23-66-4
Moller E.
Lamasine T.
6-16-3
Piros Z.[1]
Neumayer L.
6-36-2
Misolic F.[8]
Geerts M.
6-47-67
Travaglia S.
Topo M.
6-46-2
Squire H.
Mikrut L.
6-36-4
Bonzi B.
Ajdukovic D.[2]
6-34-67-65
R32
Squire H.
Nicod J.
6-27-64
Squire H.
Nicod J.
6-27-64
Travaglia S.
Cerundolo J.[5]
3-66-44-0
Misolic F.[8]
Harris B.
7-56-3
Bonzi B.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-26-2
Lamasine T.
Vesely J.
6-36-4
Kovalik J.
Ionel N.
6-46-1
Geerts M.
Rottoli L.
7-626-1
Dodig M.
Molcan A.[7]
6-26-4
Neumayer L.
Erhard M.
6-36-2
Piros Z.[1]
Fatic N.
4-66-36-1
Moller E.
Klein L.[3]
7-636-3
Kasnikowski M.
Kolar Z.
6-16-2
Topo M.
Gill F.
6-27-62
Halys Q.[4]
Gakhov I.
6-36-4
Mikrut L.
Dzumhur D.[6]
6-06-1
Ajdukovic D.[2]
Forejtek J.
6-777-56-1