Zsombor Piros vs Matej Dodig — Split CH Semi-final

Split CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Zsombor Piros
HUN1
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 April 2024
clay
CRO
Matej Dodig
#254ATP
1461ELO
1430Clay ELO
20 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLLL
Piros Z.
6-3 6-3
Dodig M.
Piros Z.
662
Dodig M.
330

Zsombor Piros defeated Matej Dodig 6-3 6-3 in the Split CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120, defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Dodig M.

Dodig M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Serve advantage — Piros Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Dodig M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.0
4.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (138 vs 129). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Dodig M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
31
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
76
Break points won·Dominant
32
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
40
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
48
65

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Dodig M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
7.4+191 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Clay Elo 1430
7.6Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1461
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Dodig M.
Freshness·Even
54
53

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d) · Dodig M.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 110 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Kovalik J.
Piros Z.[1]
6-45-77-5
Semi-finals
Piros Z.[1]
Dodig M.
6-36-3
Kovalik J.
Bonzi B.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Piros Z.[1]
Misolic F.[8]
6-46-1
Dodig M.
Moller E.
6-26-0
Kovalik J.
Travaglia S.
6-47-62
Bonzi B.
Squire H.
4-66-36-4
R16
Dodig M.
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-4
Kovalik J.
Halys Q.[4]
6-23-66-4
Moller E.
Lamasine T.
6-16-3
Piros Z.[1]
Neumayer L.
6-36-2
Misolic F.[8]
Geerts M.
6-47-67
Travaglia S.
Topo M.
6-46-2
Squire H.
Mikrut L.
6-36-4
Bonzi B.
Ajdukovic D.[2]
6-34-67-65
R32
Squire H.
Nicod J.
6-27-64
Squire H.
Nicod J.
6-27-64
Travaglia S.
Cerundolo J.[5]
3-66-44-0
Misolic F.[8]
Harris B.
7-56-3
Bonzi B.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-26-2
Lamasine T.
Vesely J.
6-36-4
Kovalik J.
Ionel N.
6-46-1
Geerts M.
Rottoli L.
7-626-1
Dodig M.
Molcan A.[7]
6-26-4
Neumayer L.
Erhard M.
6-36-2
Piros Z.[1]
Fatic N.
4-66-36-1
Moller E.
Klein L.[3]
7-636-3
Kasnikowski M.
Kolar Z.
6-16-2
Topo M.
Gill F.
6-27-62
Halys Q.[4]
Gakhov I.
6-36-4
Mikrut L.
Dzumhur D.[6]
6-06-1
Ajdukovic D.[2]
Forejtek J.
6-777-56-1