Alibek Kachmazov vs Altug Celikbilek — Busan CH Round of 32

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
RUS
Alibek Kachmazov
#779ATP
1490ELO
1467Hard ELO
23 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 April 2024
hard
TUR
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Kachmazov A.
6-4 4-6 6-3
Celikbilek A.
Kachmazov A.
6462
Celikbilek A.
4631

Alibek Kachmazov defeated Altug Celikbilek 6-4 4-6 6-3 in the Busan CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Altug Celikbilek came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kachmazov A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Celikbilek A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kachmazov A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kachmazov A.Celikbilek A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.1
7.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (99 vs 23). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kachmazov A.Celikbilek A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
49
40
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
73
Break points won·Clear edge
16
38
Deciding sets·Even
61
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kachmazov A.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 49 days (−1.0)
Celikbilek A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.8
Surface form
5.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Uchiyama Y.
Hong S.
7-646-3
Semi-finals
Hong S.
Kwon S.
W/O
Uchiyama Y.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-34-67-64
Quarter-finals
Hong S.
Wong C.[8]
6-43-66-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Marchenko I.
7-653-66-3
Uchiyama Y.
Jubb P.
4-67-56-3
Kwon S.
Harris L.[6]
7-657-5
R16
Duckworth J.[1]
Fery A.
4-66-16-4
Harris L.[6]
Sekulic P.
6-47-63
Marchenko I.
Noguchi R.
6-26-3
Uchiyama Y.
Sweeny D.
6-24-66-1
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-47-61
Kwon S.
Kachmazov A.
6-46-3
Wong C.[8]
Ellis B.
7-56-2
Hong S.
Lajal M.
6-46-4
R32
Kwon S.
Bellucci M.[4]
6-46-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Roh H.
6-36-3
Sekulic P.
Nam J.
6-16-4
Fery A.
Marie J.
6-26-1
Marchenko I.
Bolt A.
6-17-61
Noguchi R.
Yunchaokete B.[5]
7-57-5
Uchiyama Y.
Shimabukuro S.[3]
6-36-0
Sweeny D.
Erel Y.
4-66-46-4
Wu T.
Hsu Y.
6-46-3
Jubb P.
Tu L.[7]
7-636-1
Harris L.[6]
Berankis R.
6-36-1
Kachmazov A.
Celikbilek A.
6-44-66-3
Wong C.[8]
Blockx A.
6-36-3
Ellis B.
Escoffier A.
6-716-37-64
Lajal M.
Chung Y.
6-36-2
Hong S.
Virtanen O.[2]
6-26-2