Coleman Wong vs Alexander Blockx — Busan CH Round of 32

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
HKG8
Coleman Wong
#111ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 April 2024
hard
BEL
Alexander Blockx
#37ATP
1906ELO
1793Hard ELO
$901kYTD
$1.8MCAREER
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Wong C.
6-3 6-3
Blockx A.
Wong C.
662
Blockx A.
330

Coleman Wong defeated Alexander Blockx 6-3 6-3 in the Busan CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alexander Blockx came in ranked #37, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Coleman Wong claimed a first win over Alexander Blockx in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-05-24Roland GarrosR128clayAlexander Blockx6-3 6-4 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Wong C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Blockx A.

Blockx A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wong C.Blockx A.
37
Serve
53
34
Return
42

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wong C.Blockx A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.4
5.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 160). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wong C.Blockx A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
43
71
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
97
Break points won·Clear edge
5
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
95
Tiebreaks·Even
88
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wong C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Blockx A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.3Hard Elo 1593
Surface ELO
6.7+200 Hard Elo edge
2.5Overall Elo 1602
ELO gap
7.5Overall Elo 1906
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wong C.Blockx A.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
95

Wong C.: 21 days rest · Blockx A.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Uchiyama Y.
Hong S.
7-646-3
Semi-finals
Hong S.
Kwon S.
W/O
Uchiyama Y.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-34-67-64
Quarter-finals
Hong S.
Wong C.[8]
6-43-66-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Marchenko I.
7-653-66-3
Uchiyama Y.
Jubb P.
4-67-56-3
Kwon S.
Harris L.[6]
7-657-5
R16
Duckworth J.[1]
Fery A.
4-66-16-4
Harris L.[6]
Sekulic P.
6-47-63
Marchenko I.
Noguchi R.
6-26-3
Uchiyama Y.
Sweeny D.
6-24-66-1
Jubb P.
Wu T.
6-47-61
Kwon S.
Kachmazov A.
6-46-3
Wong C.[8]
Ellis B.
7-56-2
Hong S.
Lajal M.
6-46-4
R32
Kwon S.
Bellucci M.[4]
6-46-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Roh H.
6-36-3
Sekulic P.
Nam J.
6-16-4
Fery A.
Marie J.
6-26-1
Marchenko I.
Bolt A.
6-17-61
Noguchi R.
Yunchaokete B.[5]
7-57-5
Uchiyama Y.
Shimabukuro S.[3]
6-36-0
Sweeny D.
Erel Y.
4-66-46-4
Wu T.
Hsu Y.
6-46-3
Jubb P.
Tu L.[7]
7-636-1
Harris L.[6]
Berankis R.
6-36-1
Kachmazov A.
Celikbilek A.
6-44-66-3
Wong C.[8]
Blockx A.
6-36-3
Ellis B.
Escoffier A.
6-716-37-64
Lajal M.
Chung Y.
6-36-2
Hong S.
Virtanen O.[2]
6-26-2