Frances Tiafoe vs Jordan Thompson — Houston Quarter-final

Houston · ATP · Quarter-final
Frances Tiafoe
USA3
Frances Tiafoe
#19ATP
1918ELO
1827Clay ELO
$1.9MYTD
$18MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 April 2024
clay
Jordan Thompson
AUS6
Jordan Thompson
#156ATP
1772ELO
1605Clay ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
Tiafoe F.
7-6 6-4
Thompson J.
Tiafoe F.
71062
Thompson J.
6840

Frances Tiafoe defeated Jordan Thompson 7-6 6-4 in the Houston quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Frances Tiafoe came in ranked #19, defending the title. Frances Tiafoe extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-06-10s HertogenboschR16grassJordan Thompson6-3 6-2
2019-02-25AcapulcoR32hardFrances Tiafoe3-6 6-4 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Tiafoe F.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Thompson J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Tiafoe F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tiafoe F.Thompson J.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
63%
65%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.9
7.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (130 vs 95). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tiafoe F.Thompson J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
83
70
Break points saved·Even
99
97
Break points won·Dominant
57
24
Deciding sets·Even
92
91
Tiebreaks·Even
98
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tiafoe F.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Thompson J.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.6+223 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Clay Elo 1605
6.4Overall Elo 1918
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1772
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
1.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
8.7
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tiafoe F.Thompson J.
Freshness·
76
—

Tiafoe F.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Shelton B.[1]
Tiafoe F.[3]
7-54-66-3
Semi-finals
Shelton B.[1]
Etcheverry T.[4]
6-746-46-4
Tiafoe F.[3]
Darderi L.
6-27-62
Quarter-finals
Etcheverry T.[4]
Mmoh M.
6-30-1
Tiafoe F.[3]
Thompson J.[6]
7-686-4
Shelton B.[1]
Nakashima B.
7-57-69
Darderi L.
Giron M.[7]
6-06-4
R16
Tiafoe F.[3]
Duckworth J.
6-26-747-5
Darderi L.
Cerundolo F.[2]
6-42-67-64
Etcheverry T.[4]
Galan D.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.
Purcell M.[8]
6-27-5
Nakashima B.
Hijikata R.
6-16-4
Shelton B.[1]
Bergs Z.
3-66-46-3
Thompson J.[6]
Kovacevic A.
4-67-617-67
Giron M.[7]
Wolf J.
6-46-3
R32
Purcell M.[8]
Michelsen A.
7-56-746-4
Duckworth J.
Brouwer G.
6-36-3
Thompson J.[6]
Wu Y.
6-46-4
Wolf J.
Ritschard A.
6-32-66-4
Hijikata R.
Eubanks C.[5]
7-647-62
Bergs Z.
Kypson P.
7-656-3
Nakashima B.
Ajdukovic D.
6-16-4
Mmoh M.
Varillas J.
6-27-64
Kovacevic A.
Kokkinakis T.
7-636-726-4
Galan D.
Paire B.
7-6136-4
Giron M.[7]
Shapovalov D.
6-27-5
Darderi L.
Kudla D.
3-67-636-2