Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva vs Pedro Sakamoto — Florianopolis CH Round of 32

Florianopolis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#250ATP
1486ELO
1470Clay ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 April 2024
clay
Pedro Sakamoto
BRA
Pedro Sakamoto
#494ATP
1281ELO
1266Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Reis Da Silva J.
7-5 7-5
Sakamoto P.
Reis Da Silva J.
772
Sakamoto P.
550

Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva defeated Pedro Sakamoto 7-5 7-5 in the Florianopolis CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Reis Da Silva J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Sakamoto P.

Sakamoto P.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Reis Da Silva J.Sakamoto P.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.1
3.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (148 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Reis Da Silva J.Sakamoto P.
Clutch Rating·Even
12
13
Break points saved·Even
49
48
Break points won·Clear edge
43
22
Deciding sets·Even
9
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
17
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Reis Da Silva J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Sakamoto P.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.1+204 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Clay Elo 1266
7.1Overall Elo 1486
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1281
5.4No prior meetings
H2H
4.6
2.2
Surface form
4.8
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
6.3
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Reis Da Silva J.Sakamoto P.
Freshness·
—
94

Sakamoto P.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 13 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Couacaud E.[7]
Reis Da Silva J.
3-66-47-61
Semi-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-3
Couacaud E.[7]
Mager G.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Luz O.
1-67-56-4
Couacaud E.[7]
Burruchaga R.[4]
6-26-1
Mager G.
Cukierman D.
7-626-1
R16
Mager G.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4-65-1
Cukierman D.
Barreiros Reyes M.
6-24-66-2
Luz O.
Monteiro T.[1]
6-37-65
Ugo Carabelli C.
Blancaneaux G.[6]
7-56-1
Reis Da Silva J.
Dutra Da Silva D.
1-66-36-4
Prado Angelo J.
Olivieri G.[5]
1-66-47-65
Couacaud E.[7]
Rodriguez L.
7-56-3
Burruchaga R.[4]
Olivo R.
7-56-2
R32
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Draxl L.[8]
6-46-1
Olivo R.
Torres J.
6-42-66-3
Blancaneaux G.[6]
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
4-67-646-3
Rodriguez L.
Roveri Sidney G.
6-46-2
Prado Angelo J.
Ribeiro E.
7-626-2
Monteiro T.[1]
Bobrov B.
6-26-4
Luz O.
Sanchez Jover C.
7-56-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Zanellato N.
6-16-766-0
Dutra Da Silva D.
Villanueva G.
4-67-656-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Sakamoto P.
7-57-5
Olivieri G.[5]
Weis A.
6-44-66-4
Couacaud E.[7]
De Almeida G.
6-46-2
Burruchaga R.[4]
Vallejo A.
6-36-4
Mager G.
Bueno G.
6-36-2
Cukierman D.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-06-3
Barreiros Reyes M.
Comesana F.[2]
6-46-3