Daniel Cukierman vs Mateo Barreiros Reyes — Florianopolis CH Round of 16

Florianopolis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ISR
Daniel Cukierman
#1338ATP
31 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 April 2024
clay
BRA
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
#1600ATP
25 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Cukierman D.
6-2 4-6 6-2
Barreiros Reyes M.
Cukierman D.
6462
Barreiros Reyes M.
2621

Daniel Cukierman defeated Mateo Barreiros Reyes 6-2 4-6 6-2 in the Florianopolis CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cukierman D.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Barreiros Reyes M.

Barreiros Reyes M.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Cukierman D.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cukierman D.Barreiros Reyes M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
52%
Service points won·Even
58%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
51%
52%
Aces / match·Even
2.5
2.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.5
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (51 vs 35). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cukierman D.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Barreiros Reyes M.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.1
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
9.1
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Couacaud E.[7]
Reis Da Silva J.
3-66-47-61
Semi-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-3
Couacaud E.[7]
Mager G.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Luz O.
1-67-56-4
Couacaud E.[7]
Burruchaga R.[4]
6-26-1
Mager G.
Cukierman D.
7-626-1
R16
Mager G.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4-65-1
Cukierman D.
Barreiros Reyes M.
6-24-66-2
Luz O.
Monteiro T.[1]
6-37-65
Ugo Carabelli C.
Blancaneaux G.[6]
7-56-1
Reis Da Silva J.
Dutra Da Silva D.
1-66-36-4
Prado Angelo J.
Olivieri G.[5]
1-66-47-65
Couacaud E.[7]
Rodriguez L.
7-56-3
Burruchaga R.[4]
Olivo R.
7-56-2
R32
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Draxl L.[8]
6-46-1
Olivo R.
Torres J.
6-42-66-3
Blancaneaux G.[6]
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
4-67-646-3
Rodriguez L.
Roveri Sidney G.
6-46-2
Prado Angelo J.
Ribeiro E.
7-626-2
Monteiro T.[1]
Bobrov B.
6-26-4
Luz O.
Sanchez Jover C.
7-56-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Zanellato N.
6-16-766-0
Dutra Da Silva D.
Villanueva G.
4-67-656-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Sakamoto P.
7-57-5
Olivieri G.[5]
Weis A.
6-44-66-4
Couacaud E.[7]
De Almeida G.
6-46-2
Burruchaga R.[4]
Vallejo A.
6-36-4
Mager G.
Bueno G.
6-36-2
Cukierman D.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-06-3
Barreiros Reyes M.
Comesana F.[2]
6-46-3