Gianluca Mager vs Daniel Cukierman — Florianopolis CH Quarter-final

Florianopolis CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ITA
Gianluca Mager
#1223ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 April 2024
clay
ISR
Daniel Cukierman
#1338ATP
31 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLLL
Mager G.
7-6 6-1
Cukierman D.
Mager G.
7762
Cukierman D.
6210

Gianluca Mager defeated Daniel Cukierman 7-6 6-1 in the Florianopolis CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Gianluca Mager came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mager G.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Cukierman D.

Cukierman D.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Mager G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mager G.Cukierman D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
46%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
50%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.8
2.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.6
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (67 vs 51). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mager G.Cukierman D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
40
3
Break points saved·Dominant
86
12
Break points won·Dominant
4
47
Deciding sets·Dominant
66
12
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
40
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mager G.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Cukierman D.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
7.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.4
Minutes 14d
5.2
4.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Couacaud E.[7]
Reis Da Silva J.
3-66-47-61
Semi-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-3
Couacaud E.[7]
Mager G.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Luz O.
1-67-56-4
Couacaud E.[7]
Burruchaga R.[4]
6-26-1
Mager G.
Cukierman D.
7-626-1
R16
Mager G.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4-65-1
Cukierman D.
Barreiros Reyes M.
6-24-66-2
Luz O.
Monteiro T.[1]
6-37-65
Ugo Carabelli C.
Blancaneaux G.[6]
7-56-1
Reis Da Silva J.
Dutra Da Silva D.
1-66-36-4
Prado Angelo J.
Olivieri G.[5]
1-66-47-65
Couacaud E.[7]
Rodriguez L.
7-56-3
Burruchaga R.[4]
Olivo R.
7-56-2
R32
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Draxl L.[8]
6-46-1
Olivo R.
Torres J.
6-42-66-3
Blancaneaux G.[6]
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
4-67-646-3
Rodriguez L.
Roveri Sidney G.
6-46-2
Prado Angelo J.
Ribeiro E.
7-626-2
Monteiro T.[1]
Bobrov B.
6-26-4
Luz O.
Sanchez Jover C.
7-56-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Zanellato N.
6-16-766-0
Dutra Da Silva D.
Villanueva G.
4-67-656-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Sakamoto P.
7-57-5
Olivieri G.[5]
Weis A.
6-44-66-4
Couacaud E.[7]
De Almeida G.
6-46-2
Burruchaga R.[4]
Vallejo A.
6-36-4
Mager G.
Bueno G.
6-36-2
Cukierman D.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-06-3
Barreiros Reyes M.
Comesana F.[2]
6-46-3