Enzo Couacaud vs Gianluca Mager — Florianopolis CH Semi-final

Florianopolis CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
FRA7
Enzo Couacaud
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 April 2024
clay
ITA
Gianluca Mager
#1223ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Couacaud E.
6-2 6-4
Mager G.
Couacaud E.
662
Mager G.
240

Enzo Couacaud defeated Gianluca Mager 6-2 6-4 in the Florianopolis CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Enzo Couacaud came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Enzo Couacaud extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-07-01WimbledonQ2grassEnzo Couacaud6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Couacaud E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Mager G.

Mager G.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Couacaud E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Couacaud E.Mager G.
1st serve in·Even
55%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.4
4.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 67). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Couacaud E.Mager G.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
47
40
Break points saved·Slight edge
79
86
Break points won·Dominant
29
4
Deciding sets·Slight edge
77
66
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
29
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Couacaud E.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mager G.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
6.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
1.6
Minutes 14d
4.4
0.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Couacaud E.[7]
Reis Da Silva J.
3-66-47-61
Semi-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-3
Couacaud E.[7]
Mager G.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Luz O.
1-67-56-4
Couacaud E.[7]
Burruchaga R.[4]
6-26-1
Mager G.
Cukierman D.
7-626-1
R16
Mager G.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4-65-1
Cukierman D.
Barreiros Reyes M.
6-24-66-2
Luz O.
Monteiro T.[1]
6-37-65
Ugo Carabelli C.
Blancaneaux G.[6]
7-56-1
Reis Da Silva J.
Dutra Da Silva D.
1-66-36-4
Prado Angelo J.
Olivieri G.[5]
1-66-47-65
Couacaud E.[7]
Rodriguez L.
7-56-3
Burruchaga R.[4]
Olivo R.
7-56-2
R32
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Draxl L.[8]
6-46-1
Olivo R.
Torres J.
6-42-66-3
Blancaneaux G.[6]
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
4-67-646-3
Rodriguez L.
Roveri Sidney G.
6-46-2
Prado Angelo J.
Ribeiro E.
7-626-2
Monteiro T.[1]
Bobrov B.
6-26-4
Luz O.
Sanchez Jover C.
7-56-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Zanellato N.
6-16-766-0
Dutra Da Silva D.
Villanueva G.
4-67-656-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Sakamoto P.
7-57-5
Olivieri G.[5]
Weis A.
6-44-66-4
Couacaud E.[7]
De Almeida G.
6-46-2
Burruchaga R.[4]
Vallejo A.
6-36-4
Mager G.
Bueno G.
6-36-2
Cukierman D.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-06-3
Barreiros Reyes M.
Comesana F.[2]
6-46-3