Javier Barranco Cosano vs Carlos Taberner — Barcelona CH Quarter-final

Barcelona CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ESP
Javier Barranco Cosano
#433ATP
1457ELO
1441Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 April 2024
clay
Carlos Taberner
ESP
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
Barranco Cosano J.
7-5 6-0
Taberner C.
Barranco Cosano J.
762
Taberner C.
500

Javier Barranco Cosano defeated Carlos Taberner 7-5 6-0 in the Barcelona CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Barranco Cosano J.serving54% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Taberner C.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Barranco Cosano J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Barranco Cosano J.Taberner C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
58%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
43%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Even
2.0
1.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (106 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Barranco Cosano J.Taberner C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
14
53
Break points saved·Even
70
74
Break points won·Dominant
33
59
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
75
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
7
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Barranco Cosano J.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Taberner C.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.0Clay Elo 1441
Surface ELO
7.0+163 Clay Elo edge
3.1Overall Elo 1457
ELO gap
6.9Overall Elo 1610
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.6
Surface form
4.4
Fatigue & Travel
4.0
Minutes 14d
3.7
0.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Hardt N.
Zapata Miralles B.[2]
6-43-66-2
Semi-finals
Zapata Miralles B.[2]
Giustino L.
7-610-0
Hardt N.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-14-66-0
Quarter-finals
Giustino L.
De Jong J.[3]
7-56-4
Hardt N.
Ionel N.
6-36-3
Zapata Miralles B.[2]
Harris B.[7]
7-57-62
Barranco Cosano J.
Taberner C.
7-56-0
R16
Harris B.[7]
Debru G.
6-00-0
Zapata Miralles B.[2]
Cecchinato M.
6-14-0
De Jong J.[3]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-36-4
Hardt N.
Royer V.
6-46-3
Ionel N.
Geerts M.
7-674-66-1
Taberner C.
Albot R.[4]
6-47-5
Barranco Cosano J.
Gakhov I.[6]
6-13-66-4
Giustino L.
Sachko V.[5]
6-46-2
R32
Harris B.[7]
Mccormick T.
6-16-1
Ionel N.
De Loore J.[8]
6-41-0
Harris B.
Mccormick T.
6-16-1
Giustino L.
Novak D.
6-35-0
Zapata Miralles B.[2]
Neumayer L.
6-36-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Erhard M.
6-47-5
De Jong J.[3]
Krutykh O.
6-16-3
Albot R.[4]
Rincon D.
0-66-46-3
Sachko V.[5]
Lamasine T.
6-766-17-5
Geerts M.
Roca Batalla O.
7-53-66-3
Debru G.
Radulov I.
6-26-4
Hardt N.
Halys Q.[1]
7-51-66-4
Royer V.
Buse I.
6-36-4
Taberner C.
Squire H.
6-46-4
Gakhov I.[6]
Moro Canas A.
7-56-2
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Naharro D.
6-16-0
Cecchinato M.
Damas M.
6-26-1