Nick Chappell vs Jose Rubin Statham — Mexico City CH Qualifying Round 1

Mexico City CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
USA8
Nick Chappell
#1489ATP
33 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 April 2024
clay
NZL
Jose Rubin Statham
39 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
Chappell N.
6-4 3-6 7-5
Statham J.
Chappell N.
6372
Statham J.
4651

Nick Chappell defeated Jose Rubin Statham 6-4 3-6 7-5 in the Mexico City CH qualifying round 1 on clay. The result followed the form book — Nick Chappell came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Nick Chappell extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Nick Chappell closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-02-27AcapulcoQ2hardNick Chappell6-4 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Chappell N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Statham J.

Statham J.serving82% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Chappell N.

Serve advantage — Statham J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chappell N.Statham J.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
33%
34%
Break points saved·Even
53%
52%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
4.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (14 vs 21). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chappell N.Statham J.
Clutch Rating·Even
0
0
Break points saved·Even
29
33
Break points won·Slight edge
8
2
Deciding sets·Even
3
6
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
13
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Chappell N.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Statham J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
2.2
Surface form
2.6
0.0Lost last 7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
9.3
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Hernandez Serrano J.
Artnak B.
6-766-40-0
Lock B.[2]
Cid R.[9]
6-17-64
Campana Lee G.[3]
Seggerman R.
6-37-69
Ayeni O.
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
6-36-0
Ejupovic E.[12]
Trotter J.
7-57-5
Mansouri S.[6]
Chappell N.[8]
7-653-66-3
Q1
Artnak B.
Bicknell B.[1]
6-10-0
Hernandez Serrano J.
Mena F.[10]
6-46-1
Lock B.[2]
Pichler D.
6-36-3
Cid R.[9]
Paz J.
4-66-26-3
Seggerman R.
Glinka D.[11]
6-737-647-64
Ayeni O.
Palan D.[4]
6-16-4
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
Langmo C.[7]
4-66-36-4
Trotter J.
Zhu E.
6-36-1
Ejupovic E.[12]
Bustamante D.
6-16-1
Chappell N.[8]
Statham J.
6-43-67-5