Skander Mansouri vs Nick Chappell — Mexico City CH Qualifying Round 2

Mexico City CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
TUN6
Skander Mansouri
#1250ATP
30 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 April 2024
clay
USA8
Nick Chappell
#1489ATP
33 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
Mansouri S.
7-6 3-6 6-3
Chappell N.
Mansouri S.
77362
Chappell N.
65631

Skander Mansouri defeated Nick Chappell 7-6 3-6 6-3 in the Mexico City CH qualifying round 2 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mansouri S.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Chappell N.

Chappell N.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Mansouri S.

Serve advantage — Mansouri S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mansouri S.Chappell N.
1st serve in·Even
59%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
58%
Return points won·Even
38%
34%
Break points saved·Even
57%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.3
3.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.5
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (15 vs 14). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mansouri S.Chappell N.
Clutch Rating·Even
2
0
Break points saved·Dominant
62
29
Break points won·Even
8
8
Deciding sets·Even
6
3
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
4
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mansouri S.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Chappell N.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.2
Surface form
2.2
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 7
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Hernandez Serrano J.
Artnak B.
6-766-40-0
Lock B.[2]
Cid R.[9]
6-17-64
Campana Lee G.[3]
Seggerman R.
6-37-69
Ayeni O.
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
6-36-0
Ejupovic E.[12]
Trotter J.
7-57-5
Mansouri S.[6]
Chappell N.[8]
7-653-66-3
Q1
Artnak B.
Bicknell B.[1]
6-10-0
Hernandez Serrano J.
Mena F.[10]
6-46-1
Lock B.[2]
Pichler D.
6-36-3
Cid R.[9]
Paz J.
4-66-26-3
Seggerman R.
Glinka D.[11]
6-737-647-64
Ayeni O.
Palan D.[4]
6-16-4
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
Langmo C.[7]
4-66-36-4
Trotter J.
Zhu E.
6-36-1
Ejupovic E.[12]
Bustamante D.
6-16-1
Chappell N.[8]
Statham J.
6-43-67-5