Cristina Bucsa vs Jule Niemeier — Bogota Round of 16

Bogota · WTA · Round of 16
Cristina Bucsa
ESP4
Cristina Bucsa
#41WTA
1722ELO
1563Clay ELO
$900kYTD
$5.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 April 2024
clay
Jule Niemeier
GER
Jule Niemeier
#569WTA
1418ELO
1398Clay ELO
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Bucsa C.
6-4 6-1
Niemeier J.
Bucsa C.
662
Niemeier J.
410

Cristina Bucsa defeated Jule Niemeier 6-4 6-1 in the Bogota round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Cristina Bucsa came in ranked #41.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bucsa C.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Niemeier J.

Niemeier J.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Bucsa C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bucsa C.Niemeier J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
42%
Service points won·Even
56%
54%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
48%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.2
2.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.0
7.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (131 vs 95). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bucsa C.Niemeier J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
60
12
Break points saved·Dominant
79
33
Break points won·Slight edge
93
82
Deciding sets·Dominant
68
9
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
27
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bucsa C.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Niemeier J.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+164 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Clay Elo 1398
9.0Overall Elo 1722
ELO gap
1.0Overall Elo 1418
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
4.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Osorio C.[6]
Bouzkova M.[1]
6-37-65
Semi-finals
Bouzkova M.[1]
Rakhimova K.[8]
6-47-62
Osorio C.[6]
Errani S.
7-646-4
Quarter-finals
Bouzkova M.[1]
Siegemund L.[7]
2-66-27-5
Errani S.
Bara I.
4-66-26-3
Rakhimova K.[8]
Bucsa C.[4]
0-66-47-5
Osorio C.[6]
Maria T.[2]
1-66-36-3
R16
Rakhimova K.[8]
Zarazua R.
7-646-756-3
Errani S.
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
6-24-66-4
Osorio C.[6]
Todoni A.
7-646-4
Siegemund L.[7]
Jones F.
6-746-46-2
Maria T.[2]
Riera J.
2-66-06-2
Bara I.
Pigossi L.
3-67-636-4
Bouzkova M.[1]
Baptiste H.
6-36-4
Bucsa C.[4]
Niemeier J.
6-46-1
R32
Riera J.
Arango E.
6-06-3
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
Timofeeva M.
6-16-3
Bouzkova M.[1]
Marino R.
6-06-3
Jones F.
Monroy Y.
6-16-2
Bucsa C.[4]
You X.
6-17-5
Maria T.[2]
Bondar A.
6-36-2
Rakhimova K.[8]
Mediorreal Arias V.
6-46-766-1
Osorio C.[6]
Stakusic M.
6-46-2
Siegemund L.[7]
Shymanovich I.
7-657-5
Niemeier J.
Brancaccio N.
6-26-3
Zarazua R.
Higuita Barraza M.
6-06-0
Errani S.
Starodubtseva Y.
6-27-65
Todoni A.
Stefanini L.
4-66-26-4
Bara I.
Zavatska K.
2-66-36-4
Pigossi L.
Podoroska N.[5]
6-46-1
Baptiste H.
Zidansek T.
6-24-66-3