Hailey Baptiste vs Tamara Zidansek — Bogota Round of 32

Bogota · WTA · Round of 32
Hailey Baptiste
USA
Hailey Baptiste
#33WTA
1844ELO
1771Clay ELO
$1.1MYTD
$3.6MCAREER
24 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 April 2024
clay
Tamara Zidansek
SLO
Tamara Zidansek
#148WTA
1655ELO
1639Clay ELO
28 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLWLLW
Baptiste H.
6-2 4-6 6-3
Zidansek T.
Baptiste H.
6462
Zidansek T.
2631

Hailey Baptiste defeated Tamara Zidansek 6-2 4-6 6-3 in the Bogota round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Hailey Baptiste came in ranked #33.

Key context

  • Match story: Hailey Baptiste closed it out in three sets, 6–2 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Baptiste H.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Zidansek T.

Zidansek T.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Baptiste H.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Baptiste H.Zidansek T.
82
Serve
—
0
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Baptiste H.Zidansek T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
45%
Service points won·Even
60%
56%
Return points won·Even
42%
46%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
1.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.2
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (129 vs 108). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Baptiste H.Zidansek T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
83
63
Break points saved·Dominant
93
39
Break points won·Clear edge
79
91
Deciding sets·Even
88
85
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
87
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Baptiste H.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Zidansek T.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.2+132 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Clay Elo 1639
7.0Overall Elo 1844
ELO gap
3.0Overall Elo 1655
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
5.1
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Baptiste H.Zidansek T.
Freshness·
—
100

Zidansek T.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Osorio C.[6]
Bouzkova M.[1]
6-37-65
Semi-finals
Bouzkova M.[1]
Rakhimova K.[8]
6-47-62
Osorio C.[6]
Errani S.
7-646-4
Quarter-finals
Bouzkova M.[1]
Siegemund L.[7]
2-66-27-5
Errani S.
Bara I.
4-66-26-3
Rakhimova K.[8]
Bucsa C.[4]
0-66-47-5
Osorio C.[6]
Maria T.[2]
1-66-36-3
R16
Rakhimova K.[8]
Zarazua R.
7-646-756-3
Errani S.
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
6-24-66-4
Osorio C.[6]
Todoni A.
7-646-4
Siegemund L.[7]
Jones F.
6-746-46-2
Maria T.[2]
Riera J.
2-66-06-2
Bara I.
Pigossi L.
3-67-636-4
Bouzkova M.[1]
Baptiste H.
6-36-4
Bucsa C.[4]
Niemeier J.
6-46-1
R32
Riera J.
Arango E.
6-06-3
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
Timofeeva M.
6-16-3
Bouzkova M.[1]
Marino R.
6-06-3
Jones F.
Monroy Y.
6-16-2
Bucsa C.[4]
You X.
6-17-5
Maria T.[2]
Bondar A.
6-36-2
Rakhimova K.[8]
Mediorreal Arias V.
6-46-766-1
Osorio C.[6]
Stakusic M.
6-46-2
Siegemund L.[7]
Shymanovich I.
7-657-5
Niemeier J.
Brancaccio N.
6-26-3
Zarazua R.
Higuita Barraza M.
6-06-0
Errani S.
Starodubtseva Y.
6-27-65
Todoni A.
Stefanini L.
4-66-26-4
Bara I.
Zavatska K.
2-66-36-4
Pigossi L.
Podoroska N.[5]
6-46-1
Baptiste H.
Zidansek T.
6-24-66-3