Francesco Passaro vs Zsombor Piros — Naples CH Round of 32

Naples CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Francesco Passaro
ITA
Francesco Passaro
#182ATP
1592ELO
1578Clay ELO
$88kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 March 2024
clay
Zsombor Piros
HUN6
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
Passaro F.
4-6 6-4 7-5
Piros Z.
Passaro F.
4672
Piros Z.
6451

Francesco Passaro defeated Zsombor Piros 4-6 6-4 7-5 in the Naples CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Passaro F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Piros Z.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Passaro F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Passaro F.Piros Z.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.1
3.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (140 vs 138). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Passaro F.Piros Z.
Clutch Rating·Even
58
57
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
84
Break points won·Clear edge
11
32
Deciding sets·Even
83
85
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Passaro F.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Piros Z.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.4Clay Elo 1578
Surface ELO
5.6+42 Clay Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1592
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1661
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.2
Surface form
6.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
4.4
7.0
3-set count
0.0
2.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Passaro F.Piros Z.
Freshness·Clear edge
64
48

Passaro F.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d) · Piros Z.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nardi L.[2]
Herbert P.[8]
5-77-636-2
Semi-finals
Herbert P.[8]
Moutet C.[5]
4-66-36-1
Nardi L.[2]
Passaro F.
3-67-56-1
Quarter-finals
Passaro F.
Blanchet U.
6-22-66-2
Moutet C.[5]
Coria F.[1]
6-17-5
Herbert P.[8]
Gea A.
6-746-46-4
Nardi L.[2]
Gigante M.
4-66-46-1
R16
Blanchet U.
Marterer M.[3]
W/O
Herbert P.[8]
Maestrelli F.
6-43-66-3
Moutet C.[5]
Basilashvili N.
6-13-67-63
Nardi L.[2]
Martineau M.
7-646-1
Coria F.[1]
Krajinovic F.
0-67-656-2
Gea A.
Fognini F.[4]
4-66-26-4
Passaro F.
Napolitano S.
7-660-66-4
Gigante M.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
4-66-46-3
R32
Basilashvili N.
Dougaz A.
4-66-17-61
Gea A.
Travaglia S.
6-36-4
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Dalla Valle E.
7-656-3
Fognini F.[4]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-31-66-2
Herbert P.[8]
Brancaccio R.
3-67-56-0
Krajinovic F.
Geerts M.
7-56-4
Gigante M.
Bonzi B.
6-36-0
Coria F.[1]
Guinard M.
6-36-0
Moutet C.[5]
Bourgue M.
6-46-4
Maestrelli F.
Cecchinato M.
7-646-4
Passaro F.
Piros Z.[6]
4-66-47-5
Napolitano S.
Furness E.
6-36-2
Blanchet U.
Fatic N.
6-36-4
Marterer M.[3]
Ymer E.
6-36-0
Martineau M.
Agamenone F.
3-67-636-2
Nardi L.[2]
Kovalik J.
6-36-3