Denis Kudla vs Bernard Tomic — San Luis Potosi CH Quarter-final

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA5
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 25 March 2024
clay
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1420Clay ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Kudla D.
6-4 3-0
Tomic B.
Kudla D.
63–
Tomic B.
40–

Denis Kudla advanced when Bernard Tomic retired 6-4 3-0 in the San Luis Potosi CH quarter-final. Denis Kudla extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-01-20Australian OpenQ1hardDenis Kudla7-6(4) 6-3
2019-04-08HoustonR32clayBernard Tomic7-6(8) 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Even
6.0
5.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (44 vs 153). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Even
50
53
Break points saved·Even
90
92
Break points won·Clear edge
19
4
Deciding sets·Slight edge
81
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
30
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudla D.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Tomic B.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.4
Surface form
4.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kudla D.Tomic B.
Freshness·
—
84

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Mejia N.
Soto M.
6-15-76-2
Semi-finals
Mejia N.
Kudla D.[5]
6-46-4
Soto M.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
7-696-3
Quarter-finals
Kudla D.[5]
Tomic B.
6-43-0
Soto M.
Barrios Vera T.[3]
6-36-4
Mejia N.
Tirante T.[1]
6-36-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
Galarneau A.
6-46-747-5
R16
Kudla D.[5]
Pospisil V.
6-07-63
Tomic B.
Huesler M.
6-41-66-4
Mejia N.
Crawford O.[8]
6-36-0
Soto M.
Dellien Velasco M.
7-56-4
Tirante T.[1]
Gaio F.
7-56-1
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Mayo A.
7-57-62
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
Cid R.
6-46-4
Galarneau A.
Duckworth J.[2]
7-613-66-1
R32
Duckworth J.[2]
Zhukayev B.
7-647-64
Mayo A.
Langmo C.
5-76-46-3
Gaio F.
Bicknell B.
3-66-46-3
Cid R.
Pacheco Mendez R.
4-66-36-2
Tirante T.[1]
Campana Lee G.
6-46-4
Tomic B.
Vacherot V.[4]
6-23-66-3
Pospisil V.
Jasika O.
6-46-2
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
Andrade A.
6-747-646-3
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Schoolkate T.
7-56-4
Mejia N.
Escobedo E.
6-737-56-1
Crawford O.[8]
Palan D.
6-46-3
Huesler M.
Krueger M.
6-736-37-66
Kudla D.[5]
Ficovich J.
6-36-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Polmans M.[7]
6-36-4
Soto M.
Lock B.
3-66-26-3
Galarneau A.
Bellier A.
6-44-66-3