Beibit Zhukayev vs Elmar Ejupovic — San Luis Potosi CH Qualifying Round 2

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
KAZ1
Beibit Zhukayev
#387ATP
1455ELO
1379Clay ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 March 2024
clay
GER9
Elmar Ejupovic
#752ATP
33 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Zhukayev B.
3-6 7-6 6-3
Ejupovic E.
Zhukayev B.
37762
Ejupovic E.
66531

Beibit Zhukayev defeated Elmar Ejupovic 3-6 7-6 6-3 in the San Luis Potosi CH qualifying round 2 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zhukayev B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Ejupovic E.

Ejupovic E.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zhukayev B.Ejupovic E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
66%
Return points won·Even
33%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
70%
Aces / match·Clear edge
11.2
8.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (139 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zhukayev B.Ejupovic E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
31
7
Break points saved·Slight edge
94
88
Break points won·Even
1
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
25
0
Tiebreaks·Dominant
63
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zhukayev B.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Ejupovic E.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.4
Surface form
2.6
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
7.9
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Soto M.
Mena F.[8]
6-37-64
Andrade A.
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
6-26-2
Zhukayev B.[1]
Ejupovic E.[9]
3-67-656-3
Mejia N.
Wessels L.[2]
6-27-5
Langmo C.[4]
Boitan G.[10]
5-76-37-5
Cid R.[6]
Kozlov S.
6-26-3
Q1
Zhukayev B.[1]
Rubio Fierros A.
6-47-60
Ejupovic E.[9]
Seggerman R.
7-617-5
Kozlov S.
Zhu E.[11]
6-06-1
Wessels L.[2]
Paz J.
7-56-4
Soto M.
Trotter J.
7-57-65
Mena F.[8]
Ayeni O.
6-36-3
Langmo C.[4]
Padilla Cote S.
6-36-2
Boitan G.[10]
Pichler D.
3-66-46-4
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
Chappell N.[5]
7-647-68
Cid R.[6]
Smith K.
6-46-2