Enzo Couacaud vs Emilio Gomez — Sao Leopoldo CH Round of 32

Sao Leopoldo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Enzo Couacaud
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 March 2024
clay
ECU
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Couacaud E.
6-4 7-6
Gomez E.
Couacaud E.
6772
Gomez E.
4630

Enzo Couacaud defeated Emilio Gomez 6-4 7-6 in the Sao Leopoldo CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Enzo Couacaud came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Enzo Couacaud extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-06-27WimbledonQ1grassEnzo Couacaud6-2 5-7 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Couacaud E.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Couacaud E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Couacaud E.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
44%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.4
1.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 13). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Couacaud E.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
47
32
Break points saved·Even
79
77
Break points won·Slight edge
29
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
77
23
Tiebreaks·Dominant
29
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Couacaud E.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gomez E.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 52 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.6
Surface form
2.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Vallejo A.
Couacaud E.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Couacaud E.
Varillas J.[1]
2-66-47-62
Vallejo A.
Meligeni Alves F.[4]
6-43-66-0
Quarter-finals
Couacaud E.
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
6-21-66-2
Varillas J.[1]
Oliveira G.[8]
6-47-64
Meligeni Alves F.[4]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
3-67-57-64
Vallejo A.
Luz O.
6-36-1
R16
Meligeni Alves F.[4]
Alves M.
W/O
Luz O.
Sakamoto P.
6-44-66-4
Varillas J.[1]
Rodriguez L.
7-625-76-3
Couacaud E.
Collarini A.
6-13-66-4
Oliveira G.[8]
Mager G.
7-656-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Cukierman D.
6-33-66-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Prado Angelo J.
6-22-67-5
Vallejo A.
Olivieri G.[6]
6-16-4
R32
Prado Angelo J.
Bobrov B.
6-40-66-2
Olivieri G.[6]
Torres J.
6-26-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Blancaneaux G.[7]
6-36-2
Sakamoto P.
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-0
Vallejo A.
Draxl L.
6-25-77-5
Varillas J.[1]
Villanueva G.
7-57-60
Rodriguez L.
Bueno G.
6-27-5
Mager G.
Dutra Da Silva D.
3-66-37-63
Oliveira G.[8]
Reis Da Silva J.
7-56-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Guillen Meza A.
6-33-66-4
Cukierman D.
Sanchez Jover C.
7-56-2
Collarini A.
Weis A.
6-36-4
Couacaud E.
Gomez E.
6-47-63
Alves M.
Olivo R.
6-36-3
Meligeni Alves F.[4]
Uchida K.
7-672-66-3
Luz O.
Monteiro T.[2]
4-66-37-5