Ugo Blanchet vs Nerman Fatic — Naples CH Round of 32

Naples CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Ugo Blanchet
#174ATP
1521ELO
1440Clay ELO
$119kYTD
$989kCAREER
27 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 March 2024
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Blanchet U.
6-3 6-4
Fatic N.
Blanchet U.
662
Fatic N.
340

Ugo Blanchet defeated Nerman Fatic 6-3 6-4 in the Naples CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Ugo Blanchet closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Blanchet U.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Blanchet U.

Serve advantage — Fatic N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Blanchet U.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Even
5.0
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (131 vs 92). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Blanchet U.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
34
24
Break points saved·Dominant
89
63
Break points won·Clear edge
15
36
Deciding sets·Clear edge
12
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Blanchet U.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Fatic N.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5Clay Elo 1440
Surface ELO
5.5+38 Clay Elo edge
5.5Overall Elo 1521
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1496
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
4.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
5.9
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nardi L.[2]
Herbert P.[8]
5-77-636-2
Semi-finals
Herbert P.[8]
Moutet C.[5]
4-66-36-1
Nardi L.[2]
Passaro F.
3-67-56-1
Quarter-finals
Passaro F.
Blanchet U.
6-22-66-2
Moutet C.[5]
Coria F.[1]
6-17-5
Herbert P.[8]
Gea A.
6-746-46-4
Nardi L.[2]
Gigante M.
4-66-46-1
R16
Blanchet U.
Marterer M.[3]
W/O
Herbert P.[8]
Maestrelli F.
6-43-66-3
Moutet C.[5]
Basilashvili N.
6-13-67-63
Nardi L.[2]
Martineau M.
7-646-1
Coria F.[1]
Krajinovic F.
0-67-656-2
Gea A.
Fognini F.[4]
4-66-26-4
Passaro F.
Napolitano S.
7-660-66-4
Gigante M.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
4-66-46-3
R32
Basilashvili N.
Dougaz A.
4-66-17-61
Gea A.
Travaglia S.
6-36-4
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Dalla Valle E.
7-656-3
Fognini F.[4]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-31-66-2
Herbert P.[8]
Brancaccio R.
3-67-56-0
Krajinovic F.
Geerts M.
7-56-4
Gigante M.
Bonzi B.
6-36-0
Coria F.[1]
Guinard M.
6-36-0
Moutet C.[5]
Bourgue M.
6-46-4
Maestrelli F.
Cecchinato M.
7-646-4
Passaro F.
Piros Z.[6]
4-66-47-5
Napolitano S.
Furness E.
6-36-2
Blanchet U.
Fatic N.
6-36-4
Marterer M.[3]
Ymer E.
6-36-0
Martineau M.
Agamenone F.
3-67-636-2
Nardi L.[2]
Kovalik J.
6-36-3